[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <02076f9d-1158-4f3e-85cc-83ee4d41091e@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 11:02:55 +0200
From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>, Wander Lairson Costa
<wander@...hat.com>
CC: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/2] igbvf: remove unused spinlock
On 9/21/24 14:52, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Wander,
>
>
> Thank you for your patch.
>
> Am 20.09.24 um 20:59 schrieb Wander Lairson Costa:
>> tx_queue_lock and stats_lock are declared and initialized, but never
>> used. Remove them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>
>
> It’d be great if you added a Fixes: tag.
Alternatively you could split this series into two, and send this patch
to iwl-next tree, without the fixes tag. For me this patch is just
a cleanup, not a fix.
>
[...]
>
> With that addressed:
>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists