[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <coaa4yade2fwwfuk6xt6rqdxatuejft2wpuvuzw3dwpskjft7f@miabhan3ddgi>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 12:07:33 +0200
From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
To: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>
Cc: Chandrasekar Ramakrishnan <rcsekar@...sung.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Martin Hundebøll <martin@...nix.com>, "Felipe Balbi (Intel)" <balbi@...nel.org>,
Raymond Tan <raymond.tan@...el.com>, Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux@...tq-group.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] can: m_can: fix missed interrupts with m_can_pci
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 11:32:49AM GMT, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-09-23 at 10:03 +0200, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 01:27:28PM GMT, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> > > The interrupt line of PCI devices is interpreted as edge-triggered,
> > > however the interrupt signal of the m_can controller integrated in Intel
> >
> > I have a similar patch though for a different setup (I didn't send it
> > yet). I have a tcan chip wired to a pin that is only capable of edge
> > interrupts.
>
> Should I also change the Fixes tag to something else then?
No, my use-case wasn't explicitly supported before, so I don't consider
it to be a fix but a new feature supporting edge triggered tcan.
>
> >
> > > Elkhart Lake CPUs appears to be generated level-triggered.
> > >
> > > Consider the following sequence of events:
> > >
> > > - IR register is read, interrupt X is set
> > > - A new interrupt Y is triggered in the m_can controller
> > > - IR register is written to acknowledge interrupt X. Y remains set in IR
> > >
> > > As at no point in this sequence no interrupt flag is set in IR, the
> > > m_can interrupt line will never become deasserted, and no edge will ever
> > > be observed to trigger another run of the ISR. This was observed to
> > > result in the TX queue of the EHL m_can to get stuck under high load,
> > > because frames were queued to the hardware in m_can_start_xmit(), but
> > > m_can_finish_tx() was never run to account for their successful
> > > transmission.
> > >
> > > To fix the issue, repeatedly read and acknowledge interrupts at the
> > > start of the ISR until no interrupt flags are set, so the next incoming
> > > interrupt will also result in an edge on the interrupt line.
> > >
> > > Fixes: cab7ffc0324f ("can: m_can: add PCI glue driver for Intel Elkhart Lake")
> > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > v2: introduce flag is_edge_triggered, so we can avoid the loop on !m_can_pci
> > >
> > > drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
> > > drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.h | 1 +
> > > drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_pci.c | 1 +
> > > 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
> > > index 47481afb9add3..2e182c3c98fed 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
> > > @@ -1207,20 +1207,31 @@ static void m_can_coalescing_update(struct m_can_classdev *cdev, u32 ir)
> > > static int m_can_interrupt_handler(struct m_can_classdev *cdev)
> > > {
> > > struct net_device *dev = cdev->net;
> > > - u32 ir;
> > > + u32 ir = 0, ir_read;
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > if (pm_runtime_suspended(cdev->dev))
> > > return IRQ_NONE;
> > >
> > > - ir = m_can_read(cdev, M_CAN_IR);
> > > + /* For m_can_pci, the interrupt line is interpreted as edge-triggered,
> > > + * but the m_can controller generates them as level-triggered. We must
> > > + * observe that IR is 0 at least once to be sure that the next
> > > + * interrupt will generate an edge.
> > > + */
> >
> > Could you please remove this hardware specific comment? As mentioned
> > above this will be independent of any specific hardware.
>
> Ok.
>
>
> >
> > > + while ((ir_read = m_can_read(cdev, M_CAN_IR)) != 0) {
> > > + ir |= ir_read;
> > > +
> > > + /* ACK all irqs */
> > > + m_can_write(cdev, M_CAN_IR, ir);
> > > +
> > > + if (!cdev->is_edge_triggered)
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > m_can_coalescing_update(cdev, ir);
> > > if (!ir)
> > > return IRQ_NONE;
> > >
> > > - /* ACK all irqs */
> > > - m_can_write(cdev, M_CAN_IR, ir);
> > > -
> > > if (cdev->ops->clear_interrupts)
> > > cdev->ops->clear_interrupts(cdev);
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.h b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.h
> > > index 92b2bd8628e6b..8c17eb94d2f98 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.h
> > > @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ struct m_can_classdev {
> > > int pm_clock_support;
> > > int pm_wake_source;
> > > int is_peripheral;
> > > + bool is_edge_triggered;
> >
> > To avoid confusion could you rename it to irq_edge_triggered or
> > something similar, to make clear that it is not about the chip but the
> > way the interrupt line is connected?
>
> Will do.
>
> >
> > Also I am not sure it is possible, but could you use
> > irq_get_trigger_type() to see if it is a level or edge based interrupt?
> > Then we wouldn't need this additional parameter at all and could just
> > detect it in m_can.c.
>
> Unfortunately that doesn't seem to work. irq_get_trigger_type() only returns a meaningful value
> after the IRQ has been requested. I thought about requesting the IRQ with IRQF_NO_AUTOEN and then
> filling in the irq_edge_triggered field before enabling the IRQ, but IRQF_NO_AUTOEN is incompatible
> with IRQF_SHARED.
The mentioned function works for me on ARM and DT even before
irq_request_threaded_irq() was called.
Also I am probably missing something here. Afer requesting the irq, the
interrupts are not enabled yet right? So can't you just request it and
check the triggertype immediately afterwards?
>
> Of course there are ways around this - checking irq_get_trigger_type() from the ISR itself, or
> adding more locking, but neither seems quite worthwhile to me. Would you agree with this?
>
> Maybe there is some other way to find out the trigger type that would be set when the IRQ is
> requested? I don't know what that would be however - so I'd just keep setting the flag statically
> for m_can_pci and leave a dynamic solution for future improvement.
No if it doesn't work easily the parameter is probably the best option.
Best
Markus
>
> Matthias
>
>
>
> >
> > Best
> > Markus
> >
> > >
> > > // Cached M_CAN_IE register content
> > > u32 active_interrupts;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_pci.c b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_pci.c
> > > index d72fe771dfc7a..f98527981402a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_pci.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_pci.c
> > > @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ static int m_can_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pci, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> > > mcan_class->pm_clock_support = 1;
> > > mcan_class->pm_wake_source = 0;
> > > mcan_class->can.clock.freq = id->driver_data;
> > > + mcan_class->is_edge_triggered = true;
> > > mcan_class->ops = &m_can_pci_ops;
> > >
> > > pci_set_drvdata(pci, mcan_class);
> > > --
> > > TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
> > > Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
> > > Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
> > > https://www.tq-group.com/
> > >
>
> --
> TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
> Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
> Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
> https://www.tq-group.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists