[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZvRNvTdnCxzeXmse@LQ3V64L9R2>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 10:51:57 -0700
From: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Davies <jonathan.davies@...anix.com>,
eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net: add more sanity checks to
qdisc_pkt_len_init()
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 03:02:57PM +0000, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> One path takes care of SKB_GSO_DODGY, assuming
> skb->len is bigger than hdr_len.
My only comment, which you may feel free to ignore, is that we've
recently merged a change to replace the term 'sanity check' in the
code [1].
Given that work is being done to replace terminology in the source
code, I am wondering if that same ruling applies to commit messages.
If so, perhaps the title of this commit can be adjusted?
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240912171446.12854-1-stephen@networkplumber.org/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists