netdev - [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.11 043/244] net: skbuff: sprinkle more __GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240925113641.1297102-43-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:24:24 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	almasrymina@...gle.com,
	asml.silence@...il.com,
	lorenzo@...nel.org,
	bigeasy@...utronix.de,
	dhowells@...hat.com,
	liangchen.linux@...il.com,
	aleksander.lobakin@...el.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.11 043/244] net: skbuff: sprinkle more __GFP_NOWARN on ingress allocs

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>

[ Upstream commit c89cca307b20917da739567a255a68a0798ee129 ]

build_skb() and frag allocations done with GFP_ATOMIC will
fail in real life, when system is under memory pressure,
and there's nothing we can do about that. So no point
printing warnings.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/core/skbuff.c | 15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 83f8cd8aa2d16..de2a044cc6656 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -314,8 +314,8 @@ void *__napi_alloc_frag_align(unsigned int fragsz, unsigned int align_mask)
 	fragsz = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(fragsz);
 
 	local_lock_nested_bh(&napi_alloc_cache.bh_lock);
-	data = __page_frag_alloc_align(&nc->page, fragsz, GFP_ATOMIC,
-				       align_mask);
+	data = __page_frag_alloc_align(&nc->page, fragsz,
+				       GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN, align_mask);
 	local_unlock_nested_bh(&napi_alloc_cache.bh_lock);
 	return data;
 
@@ -330,7 +330,8 @@ void *__netdev_alloc_frag_align(unsigned int fragsz, unsigned int align_mask)
 		struct page_frag_cache *nc = this_cpu_ptr(&netdev_alloc_cache);
 
 		fragsz = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(fragsz);
-		data = __page_frag_alloc_align(nc, fragsz, GFP_ATOMIC,
+		data = __page_frag_alloc_align(nc, fragsz,
+					       GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN,
 					       align_mask);
 	} else {
 		local_bh_disable();
@@ -349,7 +350,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *napi_skb_cache_get(void)
 	local_lock_nested_bh(&napi_alloc_cache.bh_lock);
 	if (unlikely(!nc->skb_count)) {
 		nc->skb_count = kmem_cache_alloc_bulk(net_hotdata.skbuff_cache,
-						      GFP_ATOMIC,
+						      GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN,
 						      NAPI_SKB_CACHE_BULK,
 						      nc->skb_cache);
 		if (unlikely(!nc->skb_count)) {
@@ -418,7 +419,8 @@ struct sk_buff *slab_build_skb(void *data)
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	unsigned int size;
 
-	skb = kmem_cache_alloc(net_hotdata.skbuff_cache, GFP_ATOMIC);
+	skb = kmem_cache_alloc(net_hotdata.skbuff_cache,
+			       GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
 	if (unlikely(!skb))
 		return NULL;
 
@@ -469,7 +471,8 @@ struct sk_buff *__build_skb(void *data, unsigned int frag_size)
 {
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 
-	skb = kmem_cache_alloc(net_hotdata.skbuff_cache, GFP_ATOMIC);
+	skb = kmem_cache_alloc(net_hotdata.skbuff_cache,
+			       GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
 	if (unlikely(!skb))
 		return NULL;
 
-- 
2.43.0