[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240925115823.1303019-22-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:50:41 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@...dex.ru>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
jhs@...atatu.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
jiri@...nulli.us,
edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.10 022/197] net: sched: consistently use rcu_replace_pointer() in taprio_change()
From: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@...dex.ru>
[ Upstream commit d5c4546062fd6f5dbce575c7ea52ad66d1968678 ]
According to Vinicius (and carefully looking through the whole
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b65e0af58423fc8a73aa
once again), txtime branch of 'taprio_change()' is not going to
race against 'advance_sched()'. But using 'rcu_replace_pointer()'
in the former may be a good idea as well.
Suggested-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@...dex.ru>
Acked-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
net/sched/sch_taprio.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
index b284a06b5a75f..847e1cc6052ec 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
@@ -1952,7 +1952,9 @@ static int taprio_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
goto unlock;
}
- rcu_assign_pointer(q->admin_sched, new_admin);
+ /* Not going to race against advance_sched(), but still */
+ admin = rcu_replace_pointer(q->admin_sched, new_admin,
+ lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
if (admin)
call_rcu(&admin->rcu, taprio_free_sched_cb);
} else {
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists