netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] riscv: dts: thead: Add TH1520 ethernet nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3e26f580-bc5d-448e-b5bd-9b607c33702b@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 20:39:29 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Drew Fustini <dfustini@...storrent.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
	Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
	Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>,
	Drew Fustini <drew@...7.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
	Fu Wei <wefu@...hat.com>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] riscv: dts: thead: Add TH1520 ethernet nodes

> +&mdio0 {
> +	phy0: ethernet-phy@1 {
> +		reg = <1>;
> +	};
> +
> +	phy1: ethernet-phy@2 {
> +		reg = <2>;
> +	};
> +};

Two PHYs on one bus...

> +		gmac1: ethernet@...7060000 {
> +			compatible = "thead,th1520-gmac", "snps,dwmac-3.70a";
> +			reg = <0xff 0xe7060000 0x0 0x2000>, <0xff 0xec004000 0x0 0x1000>;
> +			reg-names = "dwmac", "apb";
> +			interrupts = <67 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			interrupt-names = "macirq";
> +			clocks = <&clk CLK_GMAC_AXI>, <&clk CLK_GMAC_AXI>;
> +			clock-names = "stmmaceth", "pclk";
> +			snps,pbl = <32>;
> +			snps,fixed-burst;
> +			snps,multicast-filter-bins = <64>;
> +			snps,perfect-filter-entries = <32>;
> +			snps,axi-config = <&stmmac_axi_config>;
> +			status = "disabled";
> +
> +			mdio1: mdio {
> +				compatible = "snps,dwmac-mdio";
> +				#address-cells = <1>;
> +				#size-cells = <0>;
> +			};
> +		};
> +
> +		gmac0: ethernet@...7070000 {
> +			compatible = "thead,th1520-gmac", "snps,dwmac-3.70a";
> +			reg = <0xff 0xe7070000 0x0 0x2000>, <0xff 0xec003000 0x0 0x1000>;
> +			reg-names = "dwmac", "apb";
> +			interrupts = <66 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			interrupt-names = "macirq";
> +			clocks = <&clk CLK_GMAC_AXI>, <&clk CLK_GMAC_AXI>;

And the MACs are listed in opposite order. Does gmac1 probe first,
find the PHY does not exist, and return -EPROBE_DEFER. Then gmac0
probes successfully, and then sometime later gmac1 then reprobes?

I know it is normal to list nodes in address order, but you might be
able to avoid the EPROBE_DEFER if you reverse the order.

     Andrew