netdev - RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 1/1] igb: Do not bring the device up after non-fatal error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CYYPR11MB8429494B65C5E9A025BF8F96BD742@CYYPR11MB8429.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 14:40:05 +0000
From: "Pucha, HimasekharX Reddy" <himasekharx.reddy.pucha@...el.com>
To: Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@...estorage.com>, "Nguyen, Anthony L"
	<anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, "Kitszel, Przemyslaw"
	<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@...hat.com>, Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
	"Zhong, YuanYuan" <yzhong@...estorage.com>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>,
	"Ying Hsu" <yinghsu@...omium.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 1/1] igb: Do not bring the device up
 after non-fatal error

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@...osl.org> On Behalf Of Mohamed Khalfella
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2024 2:36 AM
> To: Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>; David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>; Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>; Zhong, YuanYuan <yzhong@...estorage.com>; Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>; Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@...estorage.com>; Ying Hsu <yinghsu@...omium.org>; Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 1/1] igb: Do not bring the device up after non-fatal error
>
>Commit 004d25060c78 ("igb: Fix igb_down hung on surprise removal") changed igb_io_error_detected() to ignore non-fatal pcie errors in order to avoid hung task that can happen when igb_down() is called multiple times. This caused an issue when processing transient non-fatal errors.
> igb_io_resume(), which is called after igb_io_error_detected(), assumes that device is brought down by igb_io_error_detected() if the interface is up. This resulted in panic with stacktrace below.
>
> [ T3256] igb 0000:09:00.0 haeth0: igb: haeth0 NIC Link is Down [  T292] pcieport 0000:00:1c.5: AER: Uncorrected (Non-Fatal) error received: 0000:09:00.0 [  T292] igb 0000:09:00.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Non-Fatal), type=Transaction Layer, (Requester ID)
> [  T292] igb 0000:09:00.0:   device [8086:1537] error status/mask=00004000/00000000
> [  T292] igb 0000:09:00.0:    [14] CmpltTO [  200.105524,009][  T292] igb 0000:09:00.0: AER:   TLP Header: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> [  T292] pcieport 0000:00:1c.5: AER: broadcast error_detected message [  T292] igb 0000:09:00.0: Non-correctable non-fatal error reported.
> [  T292] pcieport 0000:00:1c.5: AER: broadcast mmio_enabled message [  T292] pcieport 0000:00:1c.5: AER: broadcast resume message [  T292] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [  T292] kernel BUG at net/core/dev.c:6539!
> [  T292] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [  T292] RIP: 0010:napi_enable+0x37/0x40 [  T292] Call Trace:
> [  T292]  <TASK>
> [  T292]  ? die+0x33/0x90
> [  T292]  ? do_trap+0xdc/0x110
> [  T292]  ? napi_enable+0x37/0x40
> [  T292]  ? do_error_trap+0x70/0xb0
> [  T292]  ? napi_enable+0x37/0x40
> [  T292]  ? napi_enable+0x37/0x40
> [  T292]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x4e/0x70
> [  T292]  ? napi_enable+0x37/0x40
> [  T292]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 [  T292]  ? napi_enable+0x37/0x40 [  T292]  igb_up+0x41/0x150 [  T292]  igb_io_resume+0x25/0x70 [  T292]  report_resume+0x54/0x70 [  T292]  ? report_frozen_detected+0x20/0x20 [  T292]  pci_walk_bus+0x6c/0x90 [  T292]  ? aer_print_port_info+0xa0/0xa0 [  T292]  pcie_do_recovery+0x22f/0x380 [  T292]  aer_process_err_devices+0x110/0x160
> [  T292]  aer_isr+0x1c1/0x1e0
> [  T292]  ? disable_irq_nosync+0x10/0x10 [  T292]  irq_thread_fn+0x1a/0x60 [  T292]  irq_thread+0xe3/0x1a0 [  T292]  ? irq_set_affinity_notifier+0x120/0x120
> [  T292]  ? irq_affinity_notify+0x100/0x100 [  T292]  kthread+0xe2/0x110 [  T292]  ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
> [  T292]  ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50
> [  T292]  ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
> [  T292]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
> [  T292]  </TASK>
>
> To fix this issue igb_io_resume() checks if the interface is running and the device is not down this means igb_io_error_detected() did not bring the device down and there is no need to bring it up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@...estorage.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yuanyuan Zhong<yzhong@...estorage.com>
> Fixes: 004d25060c78 ("igb: Fix igb_down hung on surprise removal")
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

Any reproductions steps for reproduction of these issue?