[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241001193606.GA10530@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 21:36:06 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, kent.overstreet@...ux.dev,
surenb@...gle.com, pablo@...filter.org
Subject: Re: nf-nat-core: allocated memory at module unload.
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com> wrote:
[ CCing codetag folks ]
> Hello,
>
> I see this splat in 6.11.0 (plus a single patch to fix vrf xmit deadlock).
>
> Is this a known issue? Is it a serious problem?
Not known to me. Looks like an mm (rcu)+codetag problem.
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c:1114 module nf_nat func:nf_nat_register_fn has 256 allocated at module unload
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 10421 at lib/alloc_tag.c:168 alloc_tag_module_unload+0x22b/0x3f0
> Modules linked in: nf_nat(-) btrfs ufs qnx4 hfsplus hfs minix vfat msdos fat
...
> Hardware name: Default string Default string/SKYBAY, BIOS 5.12 08/04/2020
> RIP: 0010:alloc_tag_module_unload+0x22b/0x3f0
> codetag_unload_module+0x19b/0x2a0
> ? codetag_load_module+0x80/0x80
> ? up_write+0x4f0/0x4f0
"Well, yes, but actually no."
At this time, kfree_rcu() has been called on all 4 objects.
Looks like kfree_rcu no longer cares even about rcu_barrier(), and
there is no kvfree_rcu_barrier() in 6.11.
The warning goes away when I replace kfree_rcu with call_rcu+kfree
plus rcu_barrier in module exit path.
But I don't think its the right thing to do.
(referring to nf_nat_unregister_fn(), kfree_rcu(priv, rcu_head);).
Reproducer:
unshare -n iptables-nft -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp
grep nf_nat /proc/allocinfo # will list 4 allocations
rmmod nft_chain_nat
rmmod nf_nat # will WARN.
Without rmmod, the 4 allocations go away after a few seconds,
grep will no longer list them and then rmmod won't splat.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists