[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iKr2J3S-Oni9VT0-C5K0EOFdnX8eR_aRueNx2R+0f8fKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 12:29:53 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, willemb@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net-timestamp: namespacify the sysctl_tstamp_allow_data
On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 12:27 PM Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Eric,
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 4:41 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 6:18 AM Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
> > >
> > > Let it be tuned in per netns by admins.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2
> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/66fa81b2ddf10_17948d294bb@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch/
> > > 1. remove the static global from sock.c
> > > 2. reorder the tests
> > > 3. I removed the patch [1/3] because I made one mistake
> > > 4. I also removed the patch [2/3] because Willem soon will propose a
> > > packetdrill test that is better.
> > > Now, I only need to write this standalone patch.
> > > ---
> > > include/net/netns/core.h | 1 +
> > > include/net/sock.h | 2 --
> > > net/core/net_namespace.c | 1 +
> > > net/core/skbuff.c | 2 +-
> > > net/core/sock.c | 2 --
> > > net/core/sysctl_net_core.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> > > 6 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/net/netns/core.h b/include/net/netns/core.h
> > > index 78214f1b43a2..ef8b3105c632 100644
> > > --- a/include/net/netns/core.h
> > > +++ b/include/net/netns/core.h
> > > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ struct netns_core {
> > > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RPS) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYSCTL)
> > > struct cpumask *rps_default_mask;
> > > #endif
> > > + int sysctl_tstamp_allow_data;
> > > };
> >
> > This adds another hole for no good reason.
> > Please put this after sysctl_txrehash.
>
> Thanks for your reminder.
>
> Before this patch:
> struct netns_core {
> struct ctl_table_header * sysctl_hdr; /* 0 0x8 */
> int sysctl_somaxconn; /* 0x8 0x4 */
> int sysctl_optmem_max; /* 0xc 0x4 */
> u8 sysctl_txrehash; /* 0x10 0x1 */
>
> /* XXX 7 bytes hole, try to pack */
>
> struct prot_inuse * prot_inuse; /* 0x18 0x8 */
> struct cpumask * rps_default_mask; /* 0x20 0x8 */
>
> /* size: 40, cachelines: 1, members: 6 */
> /* sum members: 33, holes: 1, sum holes: 7 */
> /* last cacheline: 40 bytes */
> };
>
> After this patch:
> struct netns_core {
> struct ctl_table_header * sysctl_hdr; /* 0 0x8 */
> int sysctl_somaxconn; /* 0x8 0x4 */
> int sysctl_optmem_max; /* 0xc 0x4 */
> u8 sysctl_txrehash; /* 0x10 0x1 */
>
> /* XXX 7 bytes hole, try to pack */
>
> struct prot_inuse * prot_inuse; /* 0x18 0x8 */
> struct cpumask * rps_default_mask; /* 0x20 0x8 */
> int sysctl_tstamp_allow_data; /* 0x28 0x4 */
>
> /* size: 48, cachelines: 1, members: 7 */
> /* sum members: 37, holes: 1, sum holes: 7 */
> /* padding: 4 */
> /* last cacheline: 48 bytes */
> };
>
> See this line "/* sum members: 37, holes: 1, sum holes: 7 */", so I
> don't think I introduce a new hole here.
You certainly did. /* padding: 4 */
Overall size grew by 8 bytes, while adding one 4 byte field.
>
> After trying the suggestion you mentioned, the sum holes decreases from 7 to 3:
> struct netns_core {
> struct ctl_table_header * sysctl_hdr; /* 0 0x8 */
> int sysctl_somaxconn; /* 0x8 0x4 */
> int sysctl_optmem_max; /* 0xc 0x4 */
> u8 sysctl_txrehash; /* 0x10 0x1 */
>
> /* XXX 3 bytes hole, try to pack */
>
> int sysctl_tstamp_allow_data; /* 0x14 0x4 */
> struct prot_inuse * prot_inuse; /* 0x18 0x8 */
> struct cpumask * rps_default_mask; /* 0x20 0x8 */
>
> /* size: 40, cachelines: 1, members: 7 */
> /* sum members: 37, holes: 1, sum holes: 3 */
> /* last cacheline: 40 bytes */
> };
>
> I will adjust the patch as you said. Thank you, Eric.
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists