| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAMqyJG1aPBsRFz1XK2JvqY+QUg2HhxugVXG1ZaF8yKYg=KoP3Q@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 12:40:15 +0200 From: En-Wei WU <en-wei.wu@...onical.com> To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> Cc: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@....net>, steffen.klassert@...unet.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kai.heng.feng@...onical.com, chia-lin.kao@...onical.com, anthony.wong@...onical.com, kuan-ying.lee@...onical.com, chris.chiu@...onical.com Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec v2] xfrm: check MAC header is shown with both skb->mac_len and skb_mac_header_was_set() Hi, I would kindly ask if there is any progress :) Thanks. En-Wei. On Fri, 13 Sept 2024 at 09:04, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 7:29 AM En-Wei WU <en-wei.wu@...onical.com> wrote: > > > > > Could you try the following patch, and compile your test kernel with > > > CONFIG_DEBUG_NET=y ? > > [ 323.870221] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > [ 323.870226] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 26 at include/linux/skbuff.h:2904 > > __netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0x201/0x39d0 > > [ 323.870369] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 26 Comm: ksoftirqd/2 Not tainted > > 6.11.0-rc6-c763c4339688+ #12 > > [ 323.870372] Hardware name: Dell Inc. Latitude 5340/0SG010, BIOS > > 1.15.0 07/15/2024 > > [ 323.870373] RIP: 0010:__netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0x201/0x39d0 > > [ 323.870376] Code: 03 0f b6 14 02 48 89 f8 83 e0 07 83 c0 01 38 d0 > > 7c 08 84 d2 0f 85 b4 24 00 00 41 0f b7 87 ba 00 00 00 29 c3 66 83 f8 > > ff 75 04 <0f> 0b 31 db 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 49 8d 7f 78 48 89 > > fa 48 > > [ 323.870378] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000377838 EFLAGS: 00010246 > > [ 323.870380] RAX: 000000000000ffff RBX: 00000000ffff0061 RCX: ffff88876cf48090 > > [ 323.870381] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8881756b2e7a > > [ 323.870382] RBP: ffffc90000377a88 R08: ffff88876cf48184 R09: 0000000000000000 > > [ 323.870383] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 1ffff1102ead65b9 R12: ffff8881756b2dc0 > > [ 323.870384] R13: ffffc90000377b20 R14: ffff8881635ca000 R15: ffff8881756b2dc0 > > [ 323.870385] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88876cf00000(0000) > > knlGS:0000000000000000 > > [ 323.870387] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > > [ 323.870388] CR2: 0000769acfa9d080 CR3: 0000000712498000 CR4: 0000000000f50ef0 > > [ 323.870389] PKRU: 55555554 > > [ 323.870390] Call Trace: > > [ 323.870391] <TASK> > > [ 323.870393] ? show_regs+0x71/0x90 > > [ 323.870397] ? __warn+0xce/0x270 > > [ 323.870399] ? __netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0x201/0x39d0 > > [ 323.870401] ? report_bug+0x2ad/0x300 > > [ 323.870404] ? handle_bug+0x46/0x90 > > [ 323.870407] ? exc_invalid_op+0x19/0x50 > > [ 323.870409] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 > > [ 323.870413] ? __netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0x201/0x39d0 > > [ 323.870415] ? intel_iommu_iotlb_sync_map+0x1a/0x30 > > [ 323.870418] ? iommu_map+0xab/0x140 > > [ 323.870421] ? __pfx___netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0x10/0x10 > > [ 323.870423] ? iommu_dma_map_page+0x159/0x720 > > [ 323.870425] ? dma_map_page_attrs+0x568/0xdc0 > > [ 323.870427] ? __kasan_slab_alloc+0x9d/0xa0 > > [ 323.870430] ? __pfx_dma_map_page_attrs+0x10/0x10 > > [ 323.870431] ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x30 > > [ 323.870434] ? __build_skb_around+0x23a/0x350 > > [ 323.870437] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0xb4/0x1d0 > > [ 323.870439] ? __pfx___netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x10/0x10 > > [ 323.870441] ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x30 > > [ 323.870443] ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x8b/0x100 > > [ 323.870445] __netif_receive_skb+0x21/0x160 > > [ 323.870447] process_backlog+0x1c0/0x590 > > [ 323.870449] __napi_poll+0xab/0x560 > > [ 323.870451] net_rx_action+0x53e/0xd10 > > [ 323.870453] ? __pfx_net_rx_action+0x10/0x10 > > [ 323.870455] ? __pfx_wake_up_var+0x10/0x10 > > [ 323.870457] ? tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0x22c/0x670 > > [ 323.870461] handle_softirqs+0x18f/0x5d0 > > [ 323.870463] ? __pfx_run_ksoftirqd+0x10/0x10 > > [ 323.870465] run_ksoftirqd+0x3c/0x60 > > [ 323.870467] smpboot_thread_fn+0x2f3/0x700 > > [ 323.870470] kthread+0x2b5/0x390 > > [ 323.870472] ? __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10 > > [ 323.870474] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 > > [ 323.870476] ret_from_fork+0x43/0x90 > > [ 323.870478] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 > > [ 323.870480] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 > > [ 323.870483] </TASK> > > [ 323.870484] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > [ 350.300485] Initializing XFRM netlink socket > > [ 351.586993] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > [ 351.586999] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 26 at include/linux/skbuff.h:2904 > > dev_gro_receive+0x172c/0x2860 > > [ 351.587141] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 26 Comm: ksoftirqd/2 Tainted: G > > W 6.11.0-rc6-c763c4339688+ #12 > > [ 351.587144] Tainted: [W]=WARN > > [ 351.587145] Hardware name: Dell Inc. Latitude 5340/0SG010, BIOS > > 1.15.0 07/15/2024 > > [ 351.587147] RIP: 0010:dev_gro_receive+0x172c/0x2860 > > [ 351.587149] Code: 07 83 c2 01 38 ca 7c 08 84 c9 0f 85 d2 09 00 00 > > 8d 14 c5 00 00 00 00 41 0f b6 45 46 83 e0 c7 09 d0 41 88 45 46 e9 ee > > f9 ff ff <0f> 0b 45 31 f6 e9 64 f7 ff ff 45 31 e4 81 e3 c0 00 00 00 41 > > 0f 95 > > [ 351.587151] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000377aa8 EFLAGS: 00010246 > > [ 351.587153] RAX: ffff888128d72840 RBX: ffffffff95a0d9c0 RCX: 0000000000000000 > > [ 351.587154] RDX: 000000000000ffff RSI: ffff88876cf52418 RDI: ffff88815880ad3a > > [ 351.587155] RBP: ffffc90000377b48 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 > > [ 351.587156] R10: 1ffff110ed9ea481 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffff95a0d9d0 > > [ 351.587157] R13: ffff88815880ac80 R14: 00000000ffff008d R15: ffff88815880acb8 > > [ 351.587159] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88876cf00000(0000) > > knlGS:0000000000000000 > > [ 351.587160] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > > [ 351.587161] CR2: 000078e9ea9e25b0 CR3: 0000000712498000 CR4: 0000000000f50ef0 > > [ 351.587163] PKRU: 55555554 > > [ 351.587163] Call Trace: > > [ 351.587164] <TASK> > > [ 351.587167] ? show_regs+0x71/0x90 > > [ 351.587171] ? __warn+0xce/0x270 > > [ 351.587173] ? dev_gro_receive+0x172c/0x2860 > > [ 351.587175] ? report_bug+0x2ad/0x300 > > [ 351.587178] ? handle_bug+0x46/0x90 > > [ 351.587181] ? exc_invalid_op+0x19/0x50 > > [ 351.587182] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 > > [ 351.587187] ? dev_gro_receive+0x172c/0x2860 > > [ 351.587188] ? dev_gro_receive+0xcdd/0x2860 > > [ 351.587190] ? __pfx___netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x10/0x10 > > [ 351.587192] ? __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x150/0x1180 > > [ 351.587195] napi_gro_receive+0x3a2/0x900 > > [ 351.587197] gro_cell_poll+0xe5/0x1d0 > > [ 351.587200] __napi_poll+0xab/0x560 > > [ 351.587202] net_rx_action+0x53e/0xd10 > > [ 351.587204] ? __pfx_net_rx_action+0x10/0x10 > > [ 351.587206] ? __pfx_wake_up_var+0x10/0x10 > > [ 351.587209] ? tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0x22c/0x670 > > [ 351.587212] handle_softirqs+0x18f/0x5d0 > > [ 351.587214] ? __pfx_run_ksoftirqd+0x10/0x10 > > [ 351.587216] run_ksoftirqd+0x3c/0x60 > > [ 351.587218] smpboot_thread_fn+0x2f3/0x700 > > [ 351.587220] kthread+0x2b5/0x390 > > [ 351.587223] ? __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10 > > [ 351.587224] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 > > [ 351.587226] ret_from_fork+0x43/0x90 > > [ 351.587229] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 > > [ 351.587231] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 > > [ 351.587234] </TASK> > > [ 351.587235] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > > > Seems like the __netif_receive_skb_core() and dev_gro_receive() are > > the places where it calls skb_reset_mac_len() with skb->mac_header = > > ~0U. > > Ouch, let me take a look.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists