[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30f9c0d0-499c-47d6-bdf2-a86b6d300dbf@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 16:30:19 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Qingtao Cao <qingtao.cao.au@...il.com>
Cc: Qingtao Cao <qingtao.cao@...i.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: phy: marvell: avoid bringing down fibre link
when autoneg is bypassed
On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 12:25:12PM +1000, Qingtao Cao wrote:
> On 88E151x the SGMII autoneg bypass mode defaults to be enabled. When it is
> activated, the device assumes a link-up status with existing configuration
> in BMCR, avoid bringing down the fibre link in this case
>
> Test case:
> 1. Two 88E151x connected with SFP, both enable autoneg, link is up with speed
> 1000M
> 2. Disable autoneg on one device and explicitly set its speed to 1000M
> 3. The fibre link can still up with this change, otherwise not.
What is actually wrong here?
If both ends are performing auto-neg, i would expect a link at the
highest speeds both link peers support.
If one peer is doing autoneg, the other not, i expect link down, this
is not a valid configuration, since one peer is going to fail to
auto-neg.
If both peers are using forced 1000M, i would expect a link.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists