[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMArcTXUjb5XuzvKx03_xGrEcA4OEP6aXW2P0eCpjk9_WaUS8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 02:22:56 +0900
From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
To: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, almasrymina@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, donald.hunter@...il.com, corbet@....net,
kory.maincent@...tlin.com, andrew@...n.ch, maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com,
danieller@...dia.com, hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com, ecree.xilinx@...il.com,
przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, hkallweit1@...il.com, ahmed.zaki@...el.com,
paul.greenwalt@...el.com, rrameshbabu@...dia.com, idosch@...dia.com,
asml.silence@...il.com, kaiyuanz@...gle.com, willemb@...gle.com,
aleksander.lobakin@...el.com, dw@...idwei.uk, sridhar.samudrala@...el.com,
bcreeley@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/7] bnxt_en: add support for rx-copybreak
ethtool command
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 2:14 AM Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com> wrote:
>
Hi Michael,
Thanks a lot for the review!
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 9:06 AM Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > The bnxt_en driver supports rx-copybreak, but it couldn't be set by
> > userspace. Only the default value(256) has worked.
> > This patch makes the bnxt_en driver support following command.
> > `ethtool --set-tunable <devname> rx-copybreak <value> ` and
> > `ethtool --get-tunable <devname> rx-copybreak`.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
> > ---
> >
> > v3:
> > - Update copybreak value before closing nic.
> >
> > v2:
> > - Define max/vim rx_copybreak value.
> >
> > drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 24 +++++----
> > drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h | 6 ++-
> > .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > 3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h
> > index 69231e85140b..cff031993223 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h
> > @@ -34,6 +34,10 @@
> > #include <linux/firmware/broadcom/tee_bnxt_fw.h>
> > #endif
> >
> > +#define BNXT_DEFAULT_RX_COPYBREAK 256
> > +#define BNXT_MIN_RX_COPYBREAK 65
> > +#define BNXT_MAX_RX_COPYBREAK 1024
> > +
>
> Sorry for the late review. Perhaps we should also support a value of
> zero which means to disable RX copybreak.
I agree that we need to support disabling rx-copybreak.
What about 0 ~ 64 means to disable rx-copybreak?
Or should only 0 be allowed to disable rx-copybreak?
Thanks a lot!
Taehee Yoo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists