[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHS8izN8KweeMsYOtP7BqB_XaTcgpbZi0aust9ehOqnwrq08DQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 11:51:58 -0700
From: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 05/12] selftests: ncdevmem: Remove default arguments
On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 9:36 AM Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/02, Mina Almasry wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 10:18 AM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me> wrote:
> > >
> > > To make it clear what's required and what's not. Also, some of the
> > > values don't seem like a good defaults; for example eth1.
> > >
> > > Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>
> > > ---
> > > tools/testing/selftests/net/ncdevmem.c | 34 +++++++++-----------------
> > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/ncdevmem.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/ncdevmem.c
> > > index 699692fdfd7d..bf446d74a4f0 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/ncdevmem.c
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/ncdevmem.c
> > > @@ -42,32 +42,13 @@
> > > #define MSG_SOCK_DEVMEM 0x2000000
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > -/*
> > > - * tcpdevmem netcat. Works similarly to netcat but does device memory TCP
> > > - * instead of regular TCP. Uses udmabuf to mock a dmabuf provider.
> > > - *
> > > - * Usage:
> > > - *
> > > - * On server:
> > > - * ncdevmem -s <server IP> -c <client IP> -f eth1 -l -p 5201 -v 7
> > > - *
> >
> > No need to remove this documentation I think. This is useful since we
> > don't have a proper docs anywhere.
> >
> > Please instead update the args in the above line, if they need
> > updating, but looks like it's already correct even after this change.
>
> The client needs '-s' part. That's why I removed it - most likely
> will tend to go stale and we now have the invocation example in the
> selftest. But if you want to keep it, how about I move it to the
> top of the file and cleanup a bit? Will do for the next iteration..
Yeah, the 'docs' will need to be updated for the TX path, but I hope,
not removed. We don't really have any other clues on how to run this
thing. The docs will become less important when the kselftest is
properly up and running because it is self documenting, but just in
case anyone wants to run ncdevmem manually the docs are nice. Any
cleanup and movement for clarity is welcome indeed.
--
Thanks,
Mina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists