[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ln7fzih6nobyqhzi46juwxg24btm3usgkjsrljaxn5jeywxxjo@tlu46r6nhprs>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 02:39:19 +0300
From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Mengyuan Lou <mengyuanlou@...-swift.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 01/10] net: pcs: xpcs: move PCS reset to
.pcs_pre_config()
On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 02:04:36AM GMT, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Anyway the Russell' patch set in general looks good to me. I have no
> > more comments other than regarding the soft-reset change I described in
> > my previous message.
>
> Sorry, i've not been keeping track. Have you sent reviewed-by: and
> Tested-by: for them?
I have reviewed the series twice on the RFC and v1 stages. But I
haven't sent the Rb-tag for the series, just the standard phrase
above. I was and still am going to test it out today, when I get to
reach my hardware treasury (alas, I couldn't do that earlier this week
due to my time-table).
Regarding the tags, sorry for not explicitly submitting them. I was
going to send them after testing the series out. Seeing the patch set
has already been merged in it won't much of importance to do that now
though, but I'll send at least Tb-tag anyway after the testing.
-Serge(y)
>
> Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists