lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241003035333.49261-4-mhklinux@outlook.com>
Date: Wed,  2 Oct 2024 20:53:31 -0700
From: mhkelley58@...il.com
To: kys@...rosoft.com,
	haiyangz@...rosoft.com,
	wei.liu@...nel.org,
	decui@...rosoft.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...hat.com,
	bp@...en8.de,
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
	x86@...nel.org,
	hpa@...or.com,
	joro@...tes.org,
	will@...nel.org,
	robin.murphy@....com,
	davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
	martin.petersen@...cle.com
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] iommu/hyper-v: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense

From: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>

Current code gets the APIC IDs for CPUs numbered 255 and lower.
This code assumes cpu_possible_mask is dense, which is not true in
the general case per [1]. If cpu_possible_mask contains holes,
num_possible_cpus() is less than nr_cpu_ids, so some CPUs might get
skipped. Furthermore, getting the APIC ID of a CPU that isn't in
cpu_possible_mask is invalid.

However, the configurations that Hyper-V provides to guest VMs on x86
hardware, in combination with how x86 code assigns Linux CPU numbers,
*does* always produce a dense cpu_possible_mask. So the dense assumption
is not currently causing failures. But for robustness against future
changes in how cpu_possible_mask is populated, update the code to no
longer assume dense.

The correct approach is to determine the range to scan based on
nr_cpu_ids, and skip any CPUs that are not in the cpu_possible_mask.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/SN6PR02MB4157210CC36B2593F8572E5ED4692@SN6PR02MB4157.namprd02.prod.outlook.com/

Signed-off-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c
index 8a5c17b97310..2a86aa5d54c6 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c
@@ -164,8 +164,8 @@ static int __init hyperv_prepare_irq_remapping(void)
 	 * max cpu affinity for IOAPIC irqs. Scan cpu 0-255 and set cpu
 	 * into ioapic_max_cpumask if its APIC ID is less than 256.
 	 */
-	for (i = min_t(unsigned int, num_possible_cpus() - 1, 255); i >= 0; i--)
-		if (cpu_physical_id(i) < 256)
+	for (i = min_t(unsigned int, nr_cpu_ids - 1, 255); i >= 0; i--)
+		if (cpu_possible(i) && cpu_physical_id(i) < 256)
 			cpumask_set_cpu(i, &ioapic_max_cpumask);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.25.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ