[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241003100140.153f660e@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 10:01:40 +0200
From: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet
<corbet@....net>, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Kyle Swenson
<kyle.swenson@....tech>, Dent Project <dentproject@...uxfoundation.org>,
kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/12] net: pse-pd: pd692x0: Add support for
PSE PI priority feature
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 01:41:02 +0200
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> > + msg = pd692x0_msg_template_list[PD692X0_MSG_SET_PORT_PARAM];
> > + msg.sub[2] = id;
> > + /* Controller priority from 1 to 3 */
> > + msg.data[4] = prio + 1;
>
> Does 0 have a meaning? It just seems an odd design if it does not.
PD692x0 has an odd firmware design from the beginning. ;)
Yes, the priority available are from 1 to 3. Setting it to 0 does nothing.
Regards,
--
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists