[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241004132145.7fd208e9@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 13:21:45 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Kuniyuki Iwashima
<kuni1840@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/4] rtnetlink: Add per-netns RTNL.
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 08:12:38 -0700 Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_NET_SMALL_RTNL
> +void __rtnl_net_lock(struct net *net);
> +void __rtnl_net_unlock(struct net *net);
> +void rtnl_net_lock(struct net *net);
> +void rtnl_net_unlock(struct net *net);
> +int rtnl_net_lock_cmp_fn(const struct lockdep_map *a, const struct lockdep_map *b);
> +#else
> +#define __rtnl_net_lock(net)
> +#define __rtnl_net_unlock(net)
> +#define rtnl_net_lock(net) rtnl_lock()
> +#define rtnl_net_unlock(net) rtnl_unlock()
Let's make sure net is always evaluated?
At the very least make sure the preprocessor doesn't eat it completely
otherwise we may end up with config-dependent "unused variable"
warnings down the line.
> +#endif
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists