netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v19 06/14] mm: page_frag: reuse existing space for 'size' and 'pfmemalloc'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a6091b22-29a8-4691-99c4-72cbd4318938@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 21:05:56 +0800
From: Yunsheng Lin <yunshenglin0825@...il.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v19 06/14] mm: page_frag: reuse existing space
 for 'size' and 'pfmemalloc'

On 10/4/2024 6:40 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 12:59 AM Yunsheng Lin <yunshenglin0825@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Currently there is one 'struct page_frag' for every 'struct
>> sock' and 'struct task_struct', we are about to replace the
>> 'struct page_frag' with 'struct page_frag_cache' for them.
>> Before begin the replacing, we need to ensure the size of
>> 'struct page_frag_cache' is not bigger than the size of
>> 'struct page_frag', as there may be tens of thousands of
>> 'struct sock' and 'struct task_struct' instances in the
>> system.
>>
>> By or'ing the page order & pfmemalloc with lower bits of
>> 'va' instead of using 'u16' or 'u32' for page size and 'u8'
>> for pfmemalloc, we are able to avoid 3 or 5 bytes space waste.
>> And page address & pfmemalloc & order is unchanged for the
>> same page in the same 'page_frag_cache' instance, it makes
>> sense to fit them together.
>>
>> After this patch, the size of 'struct page_frag_cache' should be
>> the same as the size of 'struct page_frag'.
>>
>> CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>   include/linux/mm_types_task.h   | 19 +++++----
>>   include/linux/page_frag_cache.h | 26 +++++++++++-
>>   mm/page_frag_cache.c            | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>   3 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types_task.h b/include/linux/mm_types_task.h
>> index 0ac6daebdd5c..a82aa80c0ba4 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mm_types_task.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types_task.h
>> @@ -47,18 +47,21 @@ struct page_frag {
>>   #define PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE       __ALIGN_MASK(32768, ~PAGE_MASK)
>>   #define PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_ORDER      get_order(PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE)
>>   struct page_frag_cache {
>> -       void *va;
>> -#if (PAGE_SIZE < PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE)
>> +       /* encoded_page consists of the virtual address, pfmemalloc bit and
>> +        * order of a page.
>> +        */
>> +       unsigned long encoded_page;
>> +
>> +       /* we maintain a pagecount bias, so that we dont dirty cache line
>> +        * containing page->_refcount every time we allocate a fragment.
>> +        */
>> +#if (PAGE_SIZE < PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE) && (BITS_PER_LONG <= 32)
>>          __u16 offset;
>> -       __u16 size;
>> +       __u16 pagecnt_bias;
>>   #else
>>          __u32 offset;
>> +       __u32 pagecnt_bias;
>>   #endif
>> -       /* we maintain a pagecount bias, so that we dont dirty cache line
>> -        * containing page->_refcount every time we allocate a fragment.
>> -        */
>> -       unsigned int            pagecnt_bias;
>> -       bool pfmemalloc;
>>   };
>>
>>   /* Track pages that require TLB flushes */
>> diff --git a/include/linux/page_frag_cache.h b/include/linux/page_frag_cache.h
>> index 0a52f7a179c8..75aaad6eaea2 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/page_frag_cache.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/page_frag_cache.h
>> @@ -3,18 +3,40 @@
>>   #ifndef _LINUX_PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_H
>>   #define _LINUX_PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_H
>>
>> +#include <linux/bits.h>
>>   #include <linux/log2.h>
>>   #include <linux/mm_types_task.h>
>>   #include <linux/types.h>
>>
>> +#if (PAGE_SIZE < PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE)
>> +/* Use a full byte here to enable assembler optimization as the shift
>> + * operation is usually expecting a byte.
>> + */
>> +#define PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_ORDER_MASK             GENMASK(7, 0)
>> +#define PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_PFMEMALLOC_SHIFT       8
>> +#define PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_PFMEMALLOC_BIT         BIT(PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_PFMEMALLOC_SHIFT)
>> +#else
>> +/* Compiler should be able to figure out we don't read things as any value
>> + * ANDed with 0 is 0.
>> + */
>> +#define PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_ORDER_MASK             0
>> +#define PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_PFMEMALLOC_SHIFT       0
>> +#define PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_PFMEMALLOC_BIT         BIT(PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_PFMEMALLOC_SHIFT)
>> +#endif
>> +
> 
> Minor nit on this. You probably only need to have
> PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_ORDER_SHIFT defined in the ifdef. The PFMEMALLOC bit

I guess you meant PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_ORDER_MASK here instead of
PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_ORDER_SHIFT, as the ORDER_SHIFT is always
zero?

> code is the same in both so you could pull it out.
> 
> Also depending on how you defined it you could just define the
> PFMEMALLOC_BIT as the ORDER_MASK + 1.

But the PFMEMALLOC_SHIFT still need to be defined as it is used in
page_frag_encode_page(), right? I am not sure if I understand what is
the point of defining the PFMEMALLOC_BIT as the ORDER_MASK + 1 instead
of defining the PFMEMALLOC_BIT as BIT(PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_PFMEMALLOC_SHIFT) 
here.