netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] net: phy: always set polarity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2b6f2938-12de-4ebb-9750-084de5d2af0b@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 18:35:58 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] net: phy: always set polarity_modes if op
 is supported

On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 04:51:30PM +0100, Daniel Golle wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 04:17:56PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > I'll add "active-high" as an additional property then, as I found out
> > > that both, Aquantia and Intel/MaxLinear are technically speaking
> > > active-low by default (ie. after reset) and what we need to set is a
> > > property setting the LED to be driven active-high (ie. driving VDD
> > > rather than GND) instead. I hope it's not too late to make this change
> > > also for the Aquantia driver.
> > 
> > Adding a new property should not affect backwards compatibility, so it
> > should be safe to merge at any time.
> 
> Ok, I will proceed in that direction then and post a patch shortly.
> My intial assumption that absence of 'active-low' would always imply
> the LED being driven active-high was due to the commit description of
> the introduction of the active-low property:
> 
> commit c94d1783136eb66f2a464a6891a32eeb55eaeacc
> Author: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
> Date:   Thu Jan 25 21:36:57 2024 +0100
> 
>     dt-bindings: net: phy: Make LED active-low property common
> 
>     Move LED active-low property to common.yaml. This property is currently
>     defined multiple times by bcm LEDs. This property will now be supported
>     in a generic way for PHY LEDs with the use of a generic function.
> 
>     With active-low bool property not defined, active-high is always
>     assumed.

So we have a difference between the commit message and what the
binding actually says. I would go by what the binding says.

However, what about the actual implementations? Do any do what the
commit message says?

	Andrew