netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/9] net: phy: mediatek: Move LED helper functions into mtk phy lib

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <de510d94-2f30-4418-a21a-76e8139e583f@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 14:50:36 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: SkyLake Huang (黃啟澤) <SkyLake.Huang@...iatek.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
	"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dqfext@...il.com" <dqfext@...il.com>,
	Steven Liu (劉人豪) <steven.liu@...iatek.com>,
	"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	"daniel@...rotopia.org" <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/9] net: phy: mediatek: Move LED helper
 functions into mtk phy lib

> Although this is just "moving code", we need this priv to do some
> modification for mt798x_phy_hw_led_blink_set() so that we can move it
> to mtk-phy-lib properly.

The helper is passed phydev, so it is not clear to me why the helper
cannot do:

struct mtk_socphy_priv *priv = phydev->priv;

same as the old code. Maybe you want a patch first which renames
mtk_socphy_priv to mtk_phy_priv, just to keep with the naming?

Or do you see the need for different PHYs to need different priv
structures?

	Andrew