[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZwQHHmLeBUBpH71p@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 09:06:54 -0700
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] ptp: add control over HW timestamp latch point
On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 11:37:52PM +0200, Arkadiusz Kubalewski wrote:
> HW support of PTP/timesync solutions in network PHY chips can be
> achieved with two different approaches, the timestamp maybe latched
> either in the beginning or after the Start of Frame Delimiter (SFD) [1].
>
> Allow ptp device drivers to provide user with control over the timestamp
> latch point.
This looks okay to me.
Sorry for the late reply, but I'm travelling untill Oct 11 and may not
response to messages right away.
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists