[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bad9e220ad3d2625d23b3d7230d6876aa726dd78.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 19:30:02 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net 1/2] MAINTAINERS: consistently exclude wireless
files from NETWORKING [GENERAL]
On Mon, 2024-10-07 at 15:13 +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 06:27:38PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org> writes:
> >
> > > We already exclude wireless drivers from the netdev@ traffic, to
> > > delegate it to linux-wireless@, and avoid overwhelming netdev@.
> > >
> > > Many of the following wireless-related sections MAINTAINERS
> > > are already not included in the NETWORKING [GENERAL] section.
> > > For consistency, exclude those that are.
> > >
> > > * 802.11 (including CFG80211/NL80211)
> > > * MAC80211
> > > * RFKILL
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > > MAINTAINERS | 11 +++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > > index c27f3190737f..ea3ea2c0d3fa 100644
> > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > @@ -16197,8 +16197,19 @@ F: lib/random32.c
> > > F: net/
> > > F: tools/net/
> > > F: tools/testing/selftests/net/
> > > +X: Documentation/networking/mac80211-injection.rst
> > > +X: Documentation/networking/mac80211_hwsim/
> > > +X: Documentation/networking/regulatory.rst
> > > +X: include/net/cfg80211.h
> > > +X: include/net/ieee80211_radiotap.h
> > > +X: include/net/iw_handler.h
> > > +X: include/net/mac80211.h
> > > +X: include/net/wext.h
> >
> > Should we add also lib80211.h?
>
> Thanks, I missed that one. Perhaps it should have:
>
> * An F: entry in the MAC80211
I suppose it should rather be in the 802.11 entry rather than the
MAC80211 one. I don't like the code anyway, but it's there for now :)
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists