[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ploascn2.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 19:55:13 +0200
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann
<daniel@...earbox.net>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Andrii
Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong
Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav
Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Kumar Kartikeya
Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>, Simon Sundberg <simon.sundberg@....se>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 2/4] selftests/bpf: Consolidate kernel modules into
common directory
Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 12:35:17PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/.gitignore
>> similarity index 100%
>> rename from tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/.gitignore
>> rename to tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/.gitignore
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/Makefile
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..393f407f35baf7e2b657b5d7910a6ffdecb35910
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/Makefile
>> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
>> +TEST_KMOD_DIR := $(realpath $(dir $(abspath $(lastword $(MAKEFILE_LIST)))))
>> +KDIR ?= $(abspath $(TEST_KMOD_DIR)/../../../../..)
>> +
>> +ifeq ($(V),1)
>> +Q =
>> +else
>> +Q = @
>> +endif
>> +
>> +MODULES = bpf_testmod.ko bpf_test_no_cfi.ko
>> +
>> +$(foreach m,$(MODULES),$(eval obj-m += $(m:.ko=.o)))
>> +
>> +CFLAGS_bpf_testmod.o = -I$(src)
>> +
>> +all: modules.built
>> +
>> +modules.built: *.[ch]
>
> curious, the top Makefile already checks for test_kmods/*.[ch], do we
> need *.[ch] ?
Not really for building from the top-level Makefile, that is for running
'make' inside the subdir, in case anyone tries that. Don't feel strongly
about it, so can remove it if you prefer?
-Toke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists