[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55d2ac1c-0619-4b24-b8ab-6eb5f553c1dd@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 14:27:54 +0200
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
CC: <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <ast@...nel.org>,
<daniel@...earbox.net>, <andrii@...nel.org>, <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
<hawk@...nel.org>, <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT v2 0/3] Introduce GRO support to cpumap codebase
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 12:46:00 +0200
>> Hi Lorenzo,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 12:13:42PM GMT, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
>>> Add GRO support to cpumap codebase moving the cpu_map_entry kthread to a
>>> NAPI-kthread pinned on the selected cpu.
>>>
>>> Changes in rfc v2:
>>> - get rid of dummy netdev dependency
>>>
>>> Lorenzo Bianconi (3):
>>> net: Add napi_init_for_gro routine
>>> net: add napi_threaded_poll to netdevice.h
>>> bpf: cpumap: Add gro support
>>>
>>> include/linux/netdevice.h | 3 +
>>> kernel/bpf/cpumap.c | 123 ++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>> net/core/dev.c | 27 ++++++---
>>> 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.46.0
>>>
>>
>> Sorry about the long delay - finally caught up to everything after
>> conferences.
>>
>> I re-ran my synthetic tests (including baseline). v2 is somehow showing
>> 2x bigger gains than v1 (~30% vs ~14%) for tcp_stream. Again, the only
>> variable I changed is kernel version - steering prog is active for both.
>>
>>
>> Baseline (again)
>>
>> ./tcp_rr -c -H $TASK_IP -p 50,90,99 -T4 -F8 -l30 ./tcp_stream -c -H $TASK_IP -T8 -F16 -l30
>>
>> Transactions Latency P50 (s) Latency P90 (s) Latency P99 (s) Throughput (Mbit/s)
>> Run 1 2560252 0.00009087 0.00010495 0.00011647 Run 1 15479.31
>> Run 2 2665517 0.00008575 0.00010239 0.00013311 Run 2 15162.48
>> Run 3 2755939 0.00008191 0.00010367 0.00012287 Run 3 14709.04
>> Run 4 2595680 0.00008575 0.00011263 0.00012671 Run 4 15373.06
>> Run 5 2841865 0.00007999 0.00009471 0.00012799 Run 5 15234.91
>> Average 2683850.6 0.000084854 0.00010367 0.00012543 Average 15191.76
>>
>> cpumap NAPI patches v2
>>
>> Transactions Latency P50 (s) Latency P90 (s) Latency P99 (s) Throughput (Mbit/s)
>> Run 1 2577838 0.00008575 0.00012031 0.00013695 Run 1 19914.56
>> Run 2 2729237 0.00007551 0.00013311 0.00017663 Run 2 20140.92
>> Run 3 2689442 0.00008319 0.00010495 0.00013311 Run 3 19887.48
>> Run 4 2862366 0.00008127 0.00009471 0.00010623 Run 4 19374.49
>> Run 5 2700538 0.00008319 0.00010367 0.00012799 Run 5 19784.49
>> Average 2711884.2 0.000081782 0.00011135 0.000136182 Average 19820.388
>> Delta 1.04% -3.62% 7.41% 8.57% 30.47%
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> cool, thx for testing it.
>
> @Olek: how do we want to proceed on it? Are you still working on it or do you want me
> to send a regular patch for it?
Hi,
I had a small vacation, sorry. I'm starting working on it again today.
>
> Regards,
> Lorenzo
Thanks,
Olek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists