lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZwaHgKED9kHvWeHP@nanopsycho.orion>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 15:39:12 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Maciek Machnikowski <maciek@...hnikowski.net>,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, donald.hunter@...il.com,
	arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com, saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org,
	tariqt@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] dpll: add clock quality level attribute and
 op

Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 03:33:13PM CEST, vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev wrote:
>On 09/10/2024 13:25, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
>> 
>> In order to allow driver expose quality level of the clock it is
>> running, introduce a new netlink attr with enum to carry it to the
>> userspace. Also, introduce an op the dpll netlink code calls into the
>> driver to obtain the value.
>
>The idea is good, it matches with the work Maciek is doing now in terms
>of improving POSIX clock interface. See a comment below.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c           | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/linux/dpll.h                  |  4 ++++
>>   include/uapi/linux/dpll.h             | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>   4 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml b/Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml
>> index f2894ca35de8..77a8e9ddb254 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml
>> @@ -85,6 +85,30 @@ definitions:
>>             This may happen for example if dpll device was previously
>>             locked on an input pin of type PIN_TYPE_SYNCE_ETH_PORT.
>>       render-max: true
>> +  -
>> +    type: enum
>> +    name: clock-quality-level
>> +    doc: |
>> +      level of quality of a clock device.
>> +    entries:
>> +      -
>> +        name: prc
>> +        value: 1
>> +      -
>> +        name: ssu-a
>> +      -
>> +        name: ssu-b
>> +      -
>> +        name: eec1
>> +      -
>> +        name: prtc
>> +      -
>> +        name: eprtc
>> +      -
>> +        name: eeec
>> +      -
>> +        name: eprc
>> +    render-max: true
>>     -
>>       type: const
>>       name: temp-divider
>> @@ -252,6 +276,10 @@ attribute-sets:
>>           name: lock-status-error
>>           type: u32
>>           enum: lock-status-error
>> +      -
>> +        name: clock-quality-level
>> +        type: u32
>> +        enum: clock-quality-level
>>     -
>>       name: pin
>>       enum-name: dpll_a_pin
>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
>> index fc0280dcddd1..689a6d0ff049 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
>> @@ -169,6 +169,25 @@ dpll_msg_add_temp(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>> +static int
>> +dpll_msg_add_clock_quality_level(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> +				 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> +{
>> +	const struct dpll_device_ops *ops = dpll_device_ops(dpll);
>> +	enum dpll_clock_quality_level ql;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	if (!ops->clock_quality_level_get)
>> +		return 0;
>> +	ret = ops->clock_quality_level_get(dpll, dpll_priv(dpll), &ql, extack);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +	if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLL_A_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL, ql))
>> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int
>>   dpll_msg_add_pin_prio(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>>   		      struct dpll_pin_ref *ref,
>> @@ -557,6 +576,9 @@ dpll_device_get_one(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct sk_buff *msg,
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		return ret;
>>   	ret = dpll_msg_add_lock_status(msg, dpll, extack);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +	ret = dpll_msg_add_clock_quality_level(msg, dpll, extack);
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		return ret;
>>   	ret = dpll_msg_add_mode(msg, dpll, extack);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/dpll.h b/include/linux/dpll.h
>> index 81f7b623d0ba..e99cdb8ab02c 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/dpll.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/dpll.h
>> @@ -26,6 +26,10 @@ struct dpll_device_ops {
>>   			       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>>   	int (*temp_get)(const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *dpll_priv,
>>   			s32 *temp, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> +	int (*clock_quality_level_get)(const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> +				       void *dpll_priv,
>> +				       enum dpll_clock_quality_level *ql,
>> +				       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>>   };
>>   struct dpll_pin_ops {
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/dpll.h b/include/uapi/linux/dpll.h
>> index b0654ade7b7e..0572f9376da4 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/dpll.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/dpll.h
>> @@ -79,6 +79,26 @@ enum dpll_lock_status_error {
>>   	DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_ERROR_MAX = (__DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_ERROR_MAX - 1)
>>   };
>> +/**
>> + * enum dpll_clock_quality_level - if previous status change was done due to a
>> + *   failure, this provides information of dpll device lock status error. Valid
>> + *   values for DPLL_A_LOCK_STATUS_ERROR attribute
>> + */
>> +enum dpll_clock_quality_level {
>> +	DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_PRC = 1,
>> +	DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_SSU_A,
>> +	DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_SSU_B,
>> +	DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_EEC1,
>> +	DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_PRTC,
>> +	DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_EPRTC,
>> +	DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_EEEC,
>> +	DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_EPRC,
>
>I think it would be great to provide some explanation of levels here.
>People coming from SDH area may not be familiar with some of them. Or at
>least mention ITU-T/IEEE recommendations documents to get the meanings
>of these levels.

Okay, I can put a reference to ITU document.


>
>> +
>> +	/* private: */
>> +	__DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_MAX,
>> +	DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_MAX = (__DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_MAX - 1)
>> +};
>> +
>>   #define DPLL_TEMP_DIVIDER	1000
>>   /**
>> @@ -180,6 +200,7 @@ enum dpll_a {
>>   	DPLL_A_TEMP,
>>   	DPLL_A_TYPE,
>>   	DPLL_A_LOCK_STATUS_ERROR,
>> +	DPLL_A_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL,
>>   	__DPLL_A_MAX,
>>   	DPLL_A_MAX = (__DPLL_A_MAX - 1)
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ