[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL+tcoAASzQsBrNuDyS-yvocyqRVutaX4McJUu6rxmPGkvt4LQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 08:30:14 +0800
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
dsahern@...nel.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, willemb@...gle.com,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 8/9] net-timestamp: add bpf framework for rx timestamps
On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 8:22 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:51:08 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:
> > +static bool tcp_bpf_recv_timestamp(struct sock *sk, struct scm_timestamping_internal *tss)
> > +{
> > + struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
> > +
> > + if (BPF_SOCK_OPS_TEST_FLAG(tp, BPF_SOCK_OPS_RX_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_CB_FLAG))
> > + return true;
> > +
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > /* Similar to __sock_recv_timestamp, but does not require an skb */
> > void tcp_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, const struct sock *sk,
> > struct scm_timestamping_internal *tss)
> > @@ -2284,6 +2294,9 @@ void tcp_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, const struct sock *sk,
> > u32 tsflags = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags);
> > bool has_timestamping = false;
> >
> > + if (tcp_bpf_recv_timestamp(sk, tss))
>
> net/ipv4/tcp.c:2297:29: error: passing 'const struct sock *' to parameter of type 'struct sock *' discards qualifiers [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types-discards-qualifiers]
> 2297 | if (tcp_bpf_recv_timestamp(sk, tss))
> | ^~
> net/ipv4/tcp.c:2279:49: note: passing argument to parameter 'sk' here
> 2279 | static bool tcp_bpf_recv_timestamp(struct sock *sk, struct scm_timestamping_internal *tss)
> | ^
Thanks, I will fix this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists