[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zwkxyr-MndeD6mmB@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 16:10:18 +0200
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To: Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov <snovitoll@...il.com>
Cc: eadavis@...com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kernel@...gutronix.de, kuba@...nel.org, leitao@...ian.org,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mkl@...gutronix.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
robin@...tonic.nl, socketcan@...tkopp.net,
syzbot+ad601904231505ad6617@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2] can: j1939: fix uaf warning in
j1939_session_destroy
Hi Sabyrzhan,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 06:41:24PM +0500, Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 19:07:55 +0800, Edward Adam Davis wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 09:49:18 +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > > the skb to the queue and increase the skb reference count through it.
> > > >
> > > > Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+ad601904231505ad6617@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > > > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=ad601904231505ad6617
> > > > Signed-off-by: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@...com>
> > >
> > > This patch breaks j1939.
> > > The issue can be reproduced by running following commands:
> > I tried to reproduce the problem using the following command, but was
> > unsuccessful. Prompt me to install j1939cat and j1939acd, and there are
> > some other errors.
> >
> > Can you share the logs from when you reproduced the problem?
ah, i was on vacation and it went under my radar, sorry :(
> Hello,
>
> Here is the log of can-tests/j1939/run_all.sh:
>
> # ip link add type vcan
> # ip l s dev vcan0 up
> # ./run_all.sh vcan0 vcan0
> ##############################################
> run: j1939_ac_100k_dual_can.sh
> generate random data for the test
> 1+0 records in
> 1+0 records out
> 102400 bytes (102 kB, 100 KiB) copied, 0.00191192 s, 53.6 MB/s
> start j1939acd and j1939cat on vcan0
> 8321
> 8323
> start j1939acd and j1939cat on vcan0
> [ 132.211317][ T8326] vcan0: tx drop: invalid sa for name 0x0000000011223340
> j1939cat: j1939cat_send_one: transfer error: -99: Cannot assign requested address
>
> It fails here:
> https://github.com/linux-can/can-tests/blob/master/j1939/j1939_ac_100k_dual_can.sh#L70
I assume it is just secondary fail, it probably failed on address claim
stage in j1939acd, so the j1939cat was not able to start transfer due to
missing (not claimed) address.
> The error message is printed in this condition:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc2/source/net/can/j1939/address-claim.c#L104-L108
>
> I've applied your patch on the current 6.12.0-rc2 and the syzkaller C repro
> doesn't trigger WARNING uaf, refcount anymore though.
Yes, because transfer protocol is broken now.
> == Offtopic:
> I wonder if can-tests/j1939 should be refactored from shell to C tests in the
> same linux-can/can-tests repository (or even migrate to KUnit tests)
> to improve debugging, test coverage. I'd like to understand which syscalls
> and params are used j1939cat and j1939acd utils -- currently, tracing with
> strace and trace-cmd (ftrace).
I have nothing against it, some of them I implemented in C:
https://github.com/linux-can/can-tests/blob/master/j1939/tst-j1939-ac.c#L1160
Right now I do not have enough time to port it, but I can support anyone
who is willing to do it.
Best Regards,
Oleksij
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists