[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241011193252.178997-2-wudevelops@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 19:32:52 +0000
From: Tyrone Wu <wudevelops@...il.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org,
wudevelops@...il.com
Cc: pablo@...filter.org,
kadlec@...filter.org,
davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
andrii@...nel.org,
eddyz87@...il.com,
mykolal@...com,
ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net,
martin.lau@...ux.dev,
song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org,
shuah@...nel.org,
riel@...riel.com,
shakeel.butt@...ux.dev,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-patches-bot@...com
Subject: [PATCH bpf v1 2/2] selftests/bpf: add asserts for netfilter link info
Add assertions/tests to verify `bpf_link_info` fields for netfilter link
are correctly populated.
Signed-off-by: Tyrone Wu <wudevelops@...il.com>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/netfilter_link_attach.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/netfilter_link_attach.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/netfilter_link_attach.c
index 4297a2a4cb11..5bf98ab2e17f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/netfilter_link_attach.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/netfilter_link_attach.c
@@ -26,10 +26,43 @@ static const struct nf_link_test nf_hook_link_tests[] = {
{ .pf = NFPROTO_INET, .priority = 1, .name = "invalid-inet-not-supported", },
- { .pf = NFPROTO_IPV4, .priority = -10000, .expect_success = true, .name = "attach ipv4", },
- { .pf = NFPROTO_IPV6, .priority = 10001, .expect_success = true, .name = "attach ipv6", },
+ {
+ .pf = NFPROTO_IPV4,
+ .hooknum = NF_INET_POST_ROUTING,
+ .priority = -10000,
+ .flags = 0,
+ .expect_success = true,
+ .name = "attach ipv4",
+ },
+ {
+ .pf = NFPROTO_IPV6,
+ .hooknum = NF_INET_FORWARD,
+ .priority = 10001,
+ .flags = BPF_F_NETFILTER_IP_DEFRAG,
+ .expect_success = true,
+ .name = "attach ipv6",
+ },
};
+static void verify_netfilter_link_info(struct bpf_link *link, const struct nf_link_test nf_expected)
+{
+ struct bpf_link_info info;
+ __u32 len = sizeof(info);
+ int err, fd;
+
+ memset(&info, 0, len);
+
+ fd = bpf_link__fd(link);
+ err = bpf_link_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &len);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "get_link_info");
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(info.type, BPF_LINK_TYPE_NETFILTER, "info link type");
+ ASSERT_EQ(info.netfilter.pf, nf_expected.pf, "info nf protocol family");
+ ASSERT_EQ(info.netfilter.hooknum, nf_expected.hooknum, "info nf hooknum");
+ ASSERT_EQ(info.netfilter.priority, nf_expected.priority, "info nf priority");
+ ASSERT_EQ(info.netfilter.flags, nf_expected.flags, "info nf flags");
+}
+
void test_netfilter_link_attach(void)
{
struct test_netfilter_link_attach *skel;
@@ -63,6 +96,7 @@ void test_netfilter_link_attach(void)
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "program attach successful"))
continue;
+ verify_netfilter_link_info(link, nf_hook_link_tests[i]);
link2 = bpf_program__attach_netfilter(prog, &opts);
ASSERT_ERR_PTR(link2, "attach program with same pf/hook/priority");
@@ -73,6 +107,8 @@ void test_netfilter_link_attach(void)
link2 = bpf_program__attach_netfilter(prog, &opts);
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link2, "program reattach successful"))
continue;
+ verify_netfilter_link_info(link2, nf_hook_link_tests[i]);
+
if (!ASSERT_OK(bpf_link__destroy(link2), "link destroy"))
break;
} else {
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists