netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/5] net_sched: sch_fq: prepare for TIME

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241011232501.52893-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 16:25:01 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <edumazet@...gle.com>
CC: <brianvv@...gle.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	<kuba@...nel.org>, <kuniyu@...zon.com>, <martin.lau@...nel.org>,
	<ncardwell@...gle.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/5] net_sched: sch_fq: prepare for TIME_WAIT sockets

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 17:48:14 +0000
> TCP stack is not attaching skb to TIME_WAIT sockets yet,
> but we would like to allow this in the future.
> 
> Add sk_listener_or_tw() helper to detect the three states
> that FQ needs to take care.
> 
> Like NEW_SYN_RECV, TIME_WAIT are not full sockets and
> do not contain sk->sk_pacing_status, sk->sk_pacing_rate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>