[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241011143158.00002eca@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 14:31:58 +0800
From: Furong Xu <0x1207@...il.com>
To: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
Cc: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, xfr@...look.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] page_pool: check for dma_sync_size earlier
Hi Ilias,
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 08:06:04 +0300, Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org> wrote:
> Hi Furong,
>
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 at 05:15, Furong Xu <0x1207@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 19:53:39 +0800, Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Is there any reason that those drivers not to unset the PP_FLAG_DMA_SYNC_DEV
> > > when calling page_pool_create()?
> > > Does it only need dma sync for some cases and not need dma sync for other
> > > cases? if so, why not do the dma sync in the driver instead?
> >
> > The answer is in this commit:
> > https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/5546da79e6cc
>
> I am not sure I am following. Where does the stmmac driver call a sync
> with len 0?
For now, only drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c does.
And stmmac driver does not yet, but I will send another patch to make it call sync with
len 0. This is a proper fix as Jakub Kicinski suggested.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists