[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cjhxc6sgmufeemnhgsv4prrf5uionxtgadsgwbxajwsljhqwao@3k4nrd2ivvtl>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 10:40:12 +0200
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: "Robert Eshleman ." <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>
Cc: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>, bobby.eshleman@...il.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH bpf 2/4] vsock: Update rx_bytes on
read_skb()
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 05:09:17PM GMT, Robert Eshleman . wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 1:49 AM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
>wrote:
>
>>
>> The modification looks good to me, but now that I'm looking at it
>> better, I don't understand why we don't also call
>> virtio_transport_send_credit_update().
>>
>> This is to inform the peer that we've freed up space and it has more
>> credit.
>>
>> @Bobby do you remember?
>>
>>
>I do not remember, but I do think it seems wrong not to.
Yeah, @Michal can you also add that call?
For now just call it, without the optimization we did for stream
packets, in the future I'll try to unify the paths.
Thanks,
Stefano
>
>
>> I think we should try to unify the receiving path used through BPF or
>> not (not for this series of course).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Stefano
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists