[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <172885281086.338120.2063739137198887833.b4-ty@kernel.dk>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 14:53:30 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, vbabka@...e.cz, paulmck@...nel.org,
Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>, Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@...hat.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux.dev,
b.a.t.m.a.n@...ts.open-mesh.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ecryptfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>, Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 00/17] replace call_rcu by kfree_rcu for
simple kmem_cache_free callback
On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 22:16:47 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Since SLOB was removed and since
> commit 6c6c47b063b5 ("mm, slab: call kvfree_rcu_barrier() from kmem_cache_destroy()"),
> it is not necessary to use call_rcu when the callback only performs
> kmem_cache_free. Use kfree_rcu() directly.
>
> The changes were done using the following Coccinelle semantic patch.
> This semantic patch is designed to ignore cases where the callback
> function is used in another way.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[09/17] block: replace call_rcu by kfree_rcu for simple kmem_cache_free callback
commit: 7a9b197adbafa9d6d1a79a0633607b78b1adef82
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists