netdev - Re: [PATCH v7 4/5] gpio: Replace deprecated PCI functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=McAfEPM0b0m6oYUO9_RC=qTd1vsg4wMn1Hb4jYQbx4irA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 09:59:08 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, 
	Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>, Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, 
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, 
	Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, 
	Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Li Zetao <lizetao1@...wei.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, 
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/5] gpio: Replace deprecated PCI functions

On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 9:53 AM Philipp Stanner <pstanner@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> pcim_iomap_regions() and pcim_iomap_table() have been deprecated by the
> PCI subsystem in commit e354bb84a4c1 ("PCI: Deprecate
> pcim_iomap_table(), pcim_iomap_regions_request_all()").
>
> Replace those functions with calls to pcim_iomap_region().
>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
> Acked-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> ---

This is part of a larger series so I acked it previously but at second
glance it doesn't look like it depends on anything that comes before?
Should it have been sent separately to the GPIO tree? Should I pick it
up independently?

Bart