netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 08/11] ipmr: Use rtnl_register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89iJuLo8y0frrcyK1RMbP4K4mfkOKdr2s93yC6_STtdRfLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 10:19:47 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 08/11] ipmr: Use rtnl_register_many().

On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:21 PM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com> wrote:
>
> We will remove rtnl_register() and rtnl_register_module() in favour
> of rtnl_register_many().
>
> When it succeeds for built-in callers, rtnl_register_many() guarantees
> all rtnetlink types in the passed array are supported, and there is no
> chance that a part of message types is not supported.
>
> Let's use rtnl_register_many() instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>

Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>