lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202410151628.hcAdeahi-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 16:40:39 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	dsahern@...nel.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
	willemb@...gle.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
	andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com,
	song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com,
	kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com,
	jolsa@...nel.org
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 09/12] net-timestamp: add tx OPT_ID_TCP
 support for bpf case

Hi Jason,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on net-next/main]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jason-Xing/net-timestamp-introduce-socket-tsflag-requestors/20241012-121010
base:   net-next/main
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241012040651.95616-10-kerneljasonxing%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH net-next v2 09/12] net-timestamp: add tx OPT_ID_TCP support for bpf case
config: x86_64-kexec (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241015/202410151628.hcAdeahi-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 18.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3b5b5c1ec4a3095ab096dd780e84d7ab81f3d7ff)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241015/202410151628.hcAdeahi-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410151628.hcAdeahi-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> net/core/sock.c:926:2: warning: variable 'tsflags' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
     926 |         tsflags |= (sk->sk_tsflags[SOCKETOPT_TS_REQUESTOR] |
         |         ^~~~~~~
   net/core/sock.c:920:13: note: initialize the variable 'tsflags' to silence this warning
     920 |         u32 tsflags;
         |                    ^
         |                     = 0
   1 warning generated.


vim +/tsflags +926 net/core/sock.c

   917	
   918	int sock_set_tskey(struct sock *sk, int val, int type)
   919	{
   920		u32 tsflags;
   921	
   922		if (val & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID_TCP &&
   923		    !(val & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID))
   924			return -EINVAL;
   925	
 > 926		tsflags |= (sk->sk_tsflags[SOCKETOPT_TS_REQUESTOR] |
   927			    sk->sk_tsflags[BPFPROG_TS_REQUESTOR]);
   928		if (val & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID &&
   929		    !(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID)) {
   930			if (sk_is_tcp(sk)) {
   931				if ((1 << sk->sk_state) &
   932				    (TCPF_CLOSE | TCPF_LISTEN))
   933					return -EINVAL;
   934				if (val & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID_TCP)
   935					atomic_set(&sk->sk_tskey, tcp_sk(sk)->write_seq);
   936				else
   937					atomic_set(&sk->sk_tskey, tcp_sk(sk)->snd_una);
   938			} else {
   939				atomic_set(&sk->sk_tskey, 0);
   940			}
   941		}
   942	
   943		return 0;
   944	}
   945	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ