netdev - [PATCH net-next 29/44] gro: flushing when CWR is set negatively affects AccECN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20241015102940.26157-30-chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 12:29:25 +0200
From: chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ij@...nel.org, ncardwell@...gle.com,
        koen.de_schepper@...ia-bell-labs.com, g.white@...leLabs.com,
        ingemar.s.johansson@...csson.com, mirja.kuehlewind@...csson.com,
        cheshire@...le.com, rs.ietf@....at, Jason_Livingood@...cast.com,
        vidhi_goel@...le.com
Cc: Chia-Yu Chang <chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 29/44] gro: flushing when CWR is set negatively affects AccECN

From: Ilpo Järvinen <ij@...nel.org>

As AccECN may keep CWR bit asserted due to different
interpretation of the bit, flushing with GRO because of
CWR may effectively disable GRO until AccECN counter
field changes such that CWR-bit becomes 0.

There is no harm done from not immediately forwarding the
CWR'ed segment with RFC3168 ECN.

Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ij@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chia-Yu Chang <chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c
index f59762d88c38..6286488abeca 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c
@@ -327,8 +327,7 @@ struct sk_buff *tcp_gro_receive(struct list_head *head, struct sk_buff *skb,
 		goto out_check_final;
 
 	th2 = tcp_hdr(p);
-	flush = (__force int)(flags & TCP_FLAG_CWR);
-	flush |= (__force int)((flags ^ tcp_flag_word(th2)) &
+	flush = (__force int)((flags ^ tcp_flag_word(th2)) &
 		  ~(TCP_FLAG_FIN | TCP_FLAG_PSH));
 	flush |= (__force int)(th->ack_seq ^ th2->ack_seq);
 	for (i = sizeof(*th); i < thlen; i += 4)
-- 
2.34.1