| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Zw6eD6/KG2ufNr/G@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 12:53:35 -0400
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, vladimir.oltean@....com,
claudiu.manoil@....com, xiaoning.wang@....com,
christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, linux@...linux.org.uk,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, horms@...nel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 10/13] net: enetc: extract
enetc_int_vector_init/destroy() from enetc_alloc_msix()
On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 08:58:38PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> From: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>
>
> Extract enetc_int_vector_init() and enetc_int_vector_destroy() from
> enetc_alloc_msix() so that the code is more concise and readable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
> ---
> v2 changes:
> This patch is separated from v1 patch 9 ("net: enetc: optimize the
> allocation of tx_bdr"). Separate enetc_int_vector_init() from the
> original patch. In addition, add new help function
> enetc_int_vector_destroy().
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c | 174 +++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> index 032d8eadd003..d36af3f8ba31 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> @@ -2965,6 +2965,87 @@ int enetc_ioctl(struct net_device *ndev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_ioctl);
>
> +static int enetc_int_vector_init(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, int i,
> + int v_tx_rings)
> +{
> + struct enetc_int_vector *v __free(kfree);
Old code have not use cleanup. Please keep exact same as old codes.
Or you should mention at commit log at least.
Frank
> + struct enetc_bdr *bdr;
> + int j, err;
> +
> + v = kzalloc(struct_size(v, tx_ring, v_tx_rings), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!v)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + bdr = &v->rx_ring;
> + bdr->index = i;
> + bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
> + bdr->dev = priv->dev;
> + bdr->bd_count = priv->rx_bd_count;
> + bdr->buffer_offset = ENETC_RXB_PAD;
> + priv->rx_ring[i] = bdr;
> +
> + err = xdp_rxq_info_reg(&bdr->xdp.rxq, priv->ndev, i, 0);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + err = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&bdr->xdp.rxq,
> + MEM_TYPE_PAGE_SHARED, NULL);
> + if (err) {
> + xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&bdr->xdp.rxq);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + /* init defaults for adaptive IC */
> + if (priv->ic_mode & ENETC_IC_RX_ADAPTIVE) {
> + v->rx_ictt = 0x1;
> + v->rx_dim_en = true;
> + }
> +
> + INIT_WORK(&v->rx_dim.work, enetc_rx_dim_work);
> + netif_napi_add(priv->ndev, &v->napi, enetc_poll);
> + v->count_tx_rings = v_tx_rings;
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < v_tx_rings; j++) {
> + int idx;
> +
> + /* default tx ring mapping policy */
> + idx = priv->bdr_int_num * j + i;
> + __set_bit(idx, &v->tx_rings_map);
> + bdr = &v->tx_ring[j];
> + bdr->index = idx;
> + bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
> + bdr->dev = priv->dev;
> + bdr->bd_count = priv->tx_bd_count;
> + priv->tx_ring[idx] = bdr;
> + }
> +
> + priv->int_vector[i] = no_free_ptr(v);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc_int_vector_destroy(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, int i)
> +{
> + struct enetc_int_vector *v = priv->int_vector[i];
> + struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring = &v->rx_ring;
> + int j, tx_ring_index;
> +
> + xdp_rxq_info_unreg_mem_model(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
> + xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
> + netif_napi_del(&v->napi);
> + cancel_work_sync(&v->rx_dim.work);
> +
> + priv->rx_ring[i] = NULL;
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < v->count_tx_rings; j++) {
> + tx_ring_index = priv->bdr_int_num * j + i;
> + priv->tx_ring[tx_ring_index] = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + kfree(v);
> + priv->int_vector[i] = NULL;
> +}
> +
> int enetc_alloc_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> {
> struct pci_dev *pdev = priv->si->pdev;
> @@ -2986,64 +3067,9 @@ int enetc_alloc_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> /* # of tx rings per int vector */
> v_tx_rings = priv->num_tx_rings / priv->bdr_int_num;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++) {
> - struct enetc_int_vector *v;
> - struct enetc_bdr *bdr;
> - int j;
> -
> - v = kzalloc(struct_size(v, tx_ring, v_tx_rings), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!v) {
> - err = -ENOMEM;
> + for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++)
> + if (enetc_int_vector_init(priv, i, v_tx_rings))
> goto fail;
> - }
> -
> - priv->int_vector[i] = v;
> -
> - bdr = &v->rx_ring;
> - bdr->index = i;
> - bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
> - bdr->dev = priv->dev;
> - bdr->bd_count = priv->rx_bd_count;
> - bdr->buffer_offset = ENETC_RXB_PAD;
> - priv->rx_ring[i] = bdr;
> -
> - err = xdp_rxq_info_reg(&bdr->xdp.rxq, priv->ndev, i, 0);
> - if (err) {
> - kfree(v);
> - goto fail;
> - }
> -
> - err = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&bdr->xdp.rxq,
> - MEM_TYPE_PAGE_SHARED, NULL);
> - if (err) {
> - xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&bdr->xdp.rxq);
> - kfree(v);
> - goto fail;
> - }
> -
> - /* init defaults for adaptive IC */
> - if (priv->ic_mode & ENETC_IC_RX_ADAPTIVE) {
> - v->rx_ictt = 0x1;
> - v->rx_dim_en = true;
> - }
> - INIT_WORK(&v->rx_dim.work, enetc_rx_dim_work);
> - netif_napi_add(priv->ndev, &v->napi, enetc_poll);
> - v->count_tx_rings = v_tx_rings;
> -
> - for (j = 0; j < v_tx_rings; j++) {
> - int idx;
> -
> - /* default tx ring mapping policy */
> - idx = priv->bdr_int_num * j + i;
> - __set_bit(idx, &v->tx_rings_map);
> - bdr = &v->tx_ring[j];
> - bdr->index = idx;
> - bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
> - bdr->dev = priv->dev;
> - bdr->bd_count = priv->tx_bd_count;
> - priv->tx_ring[idx] = bdr;
> - }
> - }
>
> num_stack_tx_queues = enetc_num_stack_tx_queues(priv);
>
> @@ -3062,16 +3088,8 @@ int enetc_alloc_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> return 0;
>
> fail:
> - while (i--) {
> - struct enetc_int_vector *v = priv->int_vector[i];
> - struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring = &v->rx_ring;
> -
> - xdp_rxq_info_unreg_mem_model(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
> - xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
> - netif_napi_del(&v->napi);
> - cancel_work_sync(&v->rx_dim.work);
> - kfree(v);
> - }
> + while (i--)
> + enetc_int_vector_destroy(priv, i);
>
> pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
>
> @@ -3083,26 +3101,8 @@ void enetc_free_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> {
> int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++) {
> - struct enetc_int_vector *v = priv->int_vector[i];
> - struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring = &v->rx_ring;
> -
> - xdp_rxq_info_unreg_mem_model(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
> - xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
> - netif_napi_del(&v->napi);
> - cancel_work_sync(&v->rx_dim.work);
> - }
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rx_rings; i++)
> - priv->rx_ring[i] = NULL;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < priv->num_tx_rings; i++)
> - priv->tx_ring[i] = NULL;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++) {
> - kfree(priv->int_vector[i]);
> - priv->int_vector[i] = NULL;
> - }
> + for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++)
> + enetc_int_vector_destroy(priv, i);
>
> /* disable all MSIX for this device */
> pci_free_irq_vectors(priv->si->pdev);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists