[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241015174031.17958-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 10:40:31 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <mkl@...gutronix.de>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<kuni1840@...il.com>, <kuniyu@...zon.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 10/11] can: gw: Use rtnl_register_many().
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:23:27 +0200
> On 14.10.2024 13:18:27, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > We will remove rtnl_register_module() in favour of rtnl_register_many().
> >
> > rtnl_register_many() will unwind the previous successful registrations
> > on failure and simplify module error handling.
> >
> > Let's use rtnl_register_many() instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
>
> Who is going to take this patch?
It will be netdev maintainers because the last patch in this series
depends on this change.
I'll add a note below "---" next time for such a case.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists