[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cxembrzcref2shryu3sisexjuf7jwn7ieknuw2eyzd5lpb7atq@ivtpvhrwww5q>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:32:14 +0200
From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: Chandrasekar Ramakrishnan <rcsekar@...sung.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>,
Vishal Mahaveer <vishalm@...com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] can: m_can: Map WoL to device_set_wakeup_enable
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 07:59:29PM GMT, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 03:16:40PM +0200, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> > In some devices the pins of the m_can module can act as a wakeup source.
> > This patch helps do that by connecting the PHY_WAKE WoL option to
> > device_set_wakeup_enable. By marking this device as being wakeup
> > enabled, this setting can be used by platform code to decide which
> > sleep or poweroff mode to use.
> >
> > Also this prepares the driver for the next patch in which the pinctrl
> > settings are changed depending on the desired wakeup source.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
> > index a978b960f1f1e1e8273216ff330ab789d0fd6d51..29accadc20de7e9efa509f14209cc62e599f03bb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
> > @@ -2185,6 +2185,36 @@ static int m_can_set_coalesce(struct net_device *dev,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static void m_can_get_wol(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_wolinfo *wol)
> > +{
> > + struct m_can_classdev *cdev = netdev_priv(dev);
> > +
> > + wol->supported = device_can_wakeup(cdev->dev) ? WAKE_PHY : 0;
> > + wol->wolopts = device_may_wakeup(cdev->dev) ? WAKE_PHY : 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int m_can_set_wol(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_wolinfo *wol)
> > +{
> > + struct m_can_classdev *cdev = netdev_priv(dev);
> > + bool wol_enable = !!wol->wolopts & WAKE_PHY;
>
> Hi Markus,
>
> I suspect there is an order of operations issue here.
> Should the line above be like this?
>
> bool wol_enable = !!(wol->wolopts & WAKE_PHY);
Yes, you are absolutely right, thanks for spotting this.
Best
Markus
>
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if ((wol->wolopts & WAKE_PHY) != wol->wolopts)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (wol_enable == device_may_wakeup(cdev->dev))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + ret = device_set_wakeup_enable(cdev->dev, wol_enable);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + netdev_err(cdev->net, "Failed to set wakeup enable %pE\n",
> > + ERR_PTR(ret));
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
>
> ...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists