[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zw866aMO9sfBXRsm@Fantasy-Ubuntu>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 22:02:49 -0600
From: Johnny Park <pjohnny0508@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] igb: Fix styling in enable/disable SR-IOV
On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 05:46:07PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:16:29 -0600 Johnny Park wrote:
> > This patch fixes the checks and warnings for igb_enable_sriov and
> > igb_disable_sriov function reported by checkpatch.pl
>
> Quoting documentation:
>
> Clean-up patches
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Netdev discourages patches which perform simple clean-ups, which are not in
> the context of other work. For example:
>
> * Addressing ``checkpatch.pl`` warnings
> * Addressing :ref:`Local variable ordering<rcs>` issues
> * Conversions to device-managed APIs (``devm_`` helpers)
>
> This is because it is felt that the churn that such changes produce comes
> at a greater cost than the value of such clean-ups.
>
> Conversely, spelling and grammar fixes are not discouraged.
>
> See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#clean-up-patches
I see. Apologies for the inconvenience, I'm new to this area so I must have missed that portion of documentation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists