netdev - RE: [PATCH v2 net-next 10/13] net: enetc: extract enetc_int_vector_init/destroy() from enetc_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <PAXPR04MB8510849CE992DD0F5F3E848488462@PAXPR04MB8510.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 05:34:27 +0000
From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
To: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>, "davem@...emloft.net"
	<davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org"
	<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Vladimir
 Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>, Frank
 Li <frank.li@....com>, "christophe.leroy@...roup.eu"
	<christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, "linux@...linux.org.uk"
	<linux@...linux.org.uk>, "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>
CC: "imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 net-next 10/13] net: enetc: extract
 enetc_int_vector_init/destroy() from enetc_alloc_msix()

> > +static int enetc_int_vector_init(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, int i,
> > +				 int v_tx_rings)
> > +{
> > +	struct enetc_int_vector *v __free(kfree);
> > +	struct enetc_bdr *bdr;
> > +	int j, err;
> > +
> > +	v = kzalloc(struct_size(v, tx_ring, v_tx_rings), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!v)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	bdr = &v->rx_ring;
> > +	bdr->index = i;
> > +	bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
> > +	bdr->dev = priv->dev;
> > +	bdr->bd_count = priv->rx_bd_count;
> > +	bdr->buffer_offset = ENETC_RXB_PAD;
> > +	priv->rx_ring[i] = bdr;
> > +
> > +	err = xdp_rxq_info_reg(&bdr->xdp.rxq, priv->ndev, i, 0);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		return err;
> > +
> > +	err = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&bdr->xdp.rxq,
> > +					 MEM_TYPE_PAGE_SHARED, NULL);
> > +	if (err) {
> > +		xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&bdr->xdp.rxq);
> > +		return err;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* init defaults for adaptive IC */
> > +	if (priv->ic_mode & ENETC_IC_RX_ADAPTIVE) {
> > +		v->rx_ictt = 0x1;
> > +		v->rx_dim_en = true;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	INIT_WORK(&v->rx_dim.work, enetc_rx_dim_work);
> > +	netif_napi_add(priv->ndev, &v->napi, enetc_poll);
> > +	v->count_tx_rings = v_tx_rings;
> > +
> > +	for (j = 0; j < v_tx_rings; j++) {
> > +		int idx;
> > +
> > +		/* default tx ring mapping policy */
> > +		idx = priv->bdr_int_num * j + i;
> > +		__set_bit(idx, &v->tx_rings_map);
> > +		bdr = &v->tx_ring[j];
> > +		bdr->index = idx;
> > +		bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
> > +		bdr->dev = priv->dev;
> > +		bdr->bd_count = priv->tx_bd_count;
> > +		priv->tx_ring[idx] = bdr;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	priv->int_vector[i] = no_free_ptr(v);
> 
> This is new, and looks like it's a fix on its own. It's fixing a dangling reference in
> int_vectror[i],
> if I'm not wrong.

This is slightly different from the original code, using cleanup to manage
dynamically allocated memory resources.

> 
> Other than that, like for the original patch:
> Reviewed-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>