[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zw91uKWJMT7YlKd0@fedora>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 08:13:44 +0000
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, Jussi Maki <joamaki@...il.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <jv@...sburgh.net>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] Documentation: bonding: add XDP support
explanation
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:38:05AM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> > +9. What modes does bonding have native XDP support?
> TBH this sounds strange and to be correct it probably needs
> to end with "for" (What modes does bonding have native XDP support for), but
> how about something straight-forward like:
>
> What bonding modes have native XDP support?
>
> or
>
> What bonding modes support native XDP?
Thanks, I will use this one.
Hangbin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists