netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 02/12] net-timestamp: open gate for bpf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL+tcoAE2NY4zFAS-_nk9ZX1X52Fvh4K2UJr9rawHo3jgLFWsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 08:45:26 +0800
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, 
	pabeni@...hat.com, dsahern@...nel.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, 
	willemb@...gle.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, 
	eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev, 
	john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me, 
	haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 02/12] net-timestamp: open gate for bpf_setsockopt

On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 5:33 AM Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> On 10/11/24 9:06 PM, Jason Xing wrote:
> >   static int sol_socket_sockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname,
> >                             char *optval, int *optlen,
> >                             bool getopt)
> >   {
> > +     struct so_timestamping ts;
> > +     int ret = 0;
> > +
> >       switch (optname) {
> >       case SO_REUSEADDR:
> >       case SO_SNDBUF:
> > @@ -5225,6 +5245,13 @@ static int sol_socket_sockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname,
> >               break;
> >       case SO_BINDTODEVICE:
> >               break;
> > +     case SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW:
> > +     case SO_TIMESTAMPING_OLD:
>
> How about remove the "_OLD" support ?

Will do that. Thanks!