[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4eec05b3-6c95-4b4a-803e-9dd24be21ab0@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:24:30 -0700
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: Karol Kolacinski <karol.kolacinski@...el.com>,
<intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Arkadiusz Kubalewski
<arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>, <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 iwl-net 1/4] ice: Fix E825
initialization
On 10/10/2024 7:21 AM, Karol Kolacinski wrote:
> @@ -2686,16 +2687,9 @@ static void ice_ptp_init_phy_e825c(struct ice_hw *hw)
> ptp->num_lports = params->num_phys * ptp->ports_per_phy;
>
> ice_sb_access_ena_eth56g(hw, true);
> - for (phy = 0; phy < params->num_phys; phy++) {
> - u32 phy_rev;
> - int err;
> -
> - err = ice_read_phy_eth56g(hw, phy, PHY_REG_REVISION, &phy_rev);
> - if (err || phy_rev != PHY_REVISION_ETH56G) {
> - ptp->phy_model = ICE_PHY_UNSUP;
> - return;
> - }
> - }
> + err = ice_read_phy_eth56g(hw, hw->pf_id, PHY_REG_REVISION, &phy_rev);
> + if (err || phy_rev != PHY_REVISION_ETH56G)
> + ptp->phy_model = ICE_PHY_UNSUP;
>
Shouldn't this return like it did above?
> ptp->is_2x50g_muxed_topo = ice_is_muxed_topo(hw);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.h
> index 0852a34ade91..35141198f261 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.h
> @@ -326,7 +326,8 @@ extern const struct ice_vernier_info_e82x e822_vernier[NUM_ICE_PTP_LNK_SPD];
> */
> #define ICE_E810_PLL_FREQ 812500000
> #define ICE_PTP_NOMINAL_INCVAL_E810 0x13b13b13bULL
> -#define E810_OUT_PROP_DELAY_NS 1
> +#define ICE_E810_OUT_PROP_DELAY_NS 1
> +#define ICE_E825_SYNC_DELAY 6
>
Why is this hunk in this patch?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists