lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241018-nf-mod-fmt-v1-1-b5a275d6861c@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 10:42:58 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>, 
 Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, 
 Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, 
 Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, 
 netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org, 
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: bpf: Pass string literal as format
 argument of request_module()

Both gcc-14 and clang-18 report that passing a non-string literal as the
format argument of request_module() is potentially insecure.

E.g. clang-18 says:

.../nf_bpf_link.c:46:24: warning: format string is not a string literal (potentially insecure) [-Wformat-security]
   46 |                 err = request_module(mod);
      |                                      ^~~
.../kmod.h:25:55: note: expanded from macro 'request_module'
   25 | #define request_module(mod...) __request_module(true, mod)
      |                                                       ^~~
.../nf_bpf_link.c:46:24: note: treat the string as an argument to avoid this
   46 |                 err = request_module(mod);
      |                                      ^
      |                                      "%s",
.../kmod.h:25:55: note: expanded from macro 'request_module'
   25 | #define request_module(mod...) __request_module(true, mod)
      |                                                       ^

It is always the case where the contents of mod is safe to pass as the
format argument. That is, in my understanding, it never contains any
format escape sequences.

But, it seems better to be safe than sorry. And, as a bonus, compiler
output becomes less verbose by addressing this issue as suggested by
clang-18.

No functional change intended.
Compile tested only.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_bpf_link.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_bpf_link.c b/net/netfilter/nf_bpf_link.c
index 5257d5e7eb09..6b9c9d71906d 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_bpf_link.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_bpf_link.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ get_proto_defrag_hook(struct bpf_nf_link *link,
 	hook = rcu_dereference(*ptr_global_hook);
 	if (!hook) {
 		rcu_read_unlock();
-		err = request_module(mod);
+		err = request_module("%s", mod);
 		if (err)
 			return ERR_PTR(err < 0 ? err : -EINVAL);
 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ