netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net] net: bcmasp: fix potential memory leak in bcmasp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d496a4dd-14be-428d-853f-785cf6200360@broadcom.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 11:18:51 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Wang Hai <wanghai38@...wei.com>
Cc: justin.chen@...adcom.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
 kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, zhangxiaoxu5@...wei.com,
 bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] net: bcmasp: fix potential memory leak in
 bcmasp_xmit()



On 10/17/2024 6:54 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 10:34:24PM +0800, Wang Hai wrote:
>> The bcmasp_xmit() returns NETDEV_TX_OK without freeing skb
>> in case of mapping fails, add dev_consume_skb_any() to fix it.
>>
>> Fixes: 490cb412007d ("net: bcmasp: Add support for ASP2.0 Ethernet controller")
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@...wei.com>
> 
> There seems to be some confusion over in the thread for v1 of this patchset.
> Perhaps relating to several similar patches being in-flight at the same
> time.
> 
> 1. Changes were requested by Florian
> 2. Jakub confirmed this concern
> 3. Florian Acked v1 patch
> 4. The bot sent a notificaiton that v1 had been applied
> 
> But v1 is not in net-next.
> And I assume that 3 was intended for v2.
> 
>  From my point of view v2 addresses the concerns raised by Florian wrt v1.
> And, moreover, I agree this fix is correct.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
> 
> v2 is marked as Changes Requested in patchwork.
> But I suspect that is due to confusion around v1 as summarised above.
> So I am (hopefully) moving it back to Under Review.
> 

v1 was applied already, which, per the discussion on the systemport 
driver appears to be the correct way to go about:

https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/fed07d3eb8a8
-- 
Florian