[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b5d1ce8b-fd7f-4c14-870d-a169d81629fc@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 09:49:13 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
<hawk@...nel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>, Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>,
Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/15] net: add helper executing custom callback from
napi
On 10/21/24 8:25 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Side notes not specifically related to this patch: I likely got lost in
> previous revision, but it's unclear to me which is the merge plan here,
> could you please (re-)word it?
In the past when there's been dependencies like this, what we've done
is:
Someone, usually Jakub, sets up a branch with the net bits only. Both
the io_uring tree and netdev-next pulls that in.
With that, then the io_uring tree can apply the io_uring specific
patches on top. And either side can send a pull, won't impact the other
tree.
I like that way of doing it, as it keeps things separate, yet still easy
to deal with for the side that needs further work/patches on top.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists