netdev - Re: [PATCH v6 08/15] net: add helper executing custom callback from napi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5eab8684-4dcc-433b-a868-0ffdd656157f@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 17:34:21 +0100
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
 Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
 Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>, Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>,
 Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/15] net: add helper executing custom callback from
 napi

On 10/21/24 16:49, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/21/24 8:25 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>> Side notes not specifically related to this patch: I likely got lost in
>> previous revision, but it's unclear to me which is the merge plan here,
>> could you please (re-)word it?
> 
> In the past when there's been dependencies like this, what we've done
> is:
> 
> Someone, usually Jakub, sets up a branch with the net bits only. Both
> the io_uring tree and netdev-next pulls that in.
> 
> With that, then the io_uring tree can apply the io_uring specific
> patches on top. And either side can send a pull, won't impact the other
> tree.
> 
> I like that way of doing it, as it keeps things separate, yet still easy
> to deal with for the side that needs further work/patches on top.

Yep, I outlined in one of the comments same thing (should put it into
the cover letter). We'll get a branch with net/ patches on the common
base, so that it can be pulled into net and io-uring trees. Then, we
can deal with io_uring patches ourselves.

-- 
Pavel Begunkov