netdev - [PATCH v1 net-next 04/12] ipv4: Don't allocate ifa for 0.0.0.0 in inet_rtm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241021183239.79741-5-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 11:32:31 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
CC: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>, Kuniyuki Iwashima
	<kuni1840@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 net-next 04/12] ipv4: Don't allocate ifa for 0.0.0.0 in inet_rtm_newaddr().

When we pass 0.0.0.0 to __inet_insert_ifa(), it frees ifa and returns 0.

We can do this check much earlier for RTM_NEWADDR even before allocating
struct in_ifaddr.

Let's move the validation to

  1. inet_insert_ifa() for ioctl()
  2. inet_rtm_newaddr() for RTM_NEWADDR

Now, we can remove the same check in find_matching_ifa().

Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
 net/ipv4/devinet.c | 17 +++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/devinet.c b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
index 24af01fcb414..5e43f9f68e4a 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/devinet.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
@@ -508,11 +508,6 @@ static int __inet_insert_ifa(struct in_ifaddr *ifa, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 
 	ASSERT_RTNL();
 
-	if (!ifa->ifa_local) {
-		inet_free_ifa(ifa);
-		return 0;
-	}
-
 	ifa->ifa_flags &= ~IFA_F_SECONDARY;
 	last_primary = &in_dev->ifa_list;
 
@@ -584,6 +579,11 @@ static int __inet_insert_ifa(struct in_ifaddr *ifa, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 
 static int inet_insert_ifa(struct in_ifaddr *ifa)
 {
+	if (!ifa->ifa_local) {
+		inet_free_ifa(ifa);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	return __inet_insert_ifa(ifa, NULL, 0, NULL);
 }
 
@@ -953,15 +953,13 @@ static struct in_ifaddr *find_matching_ifa(struct in_ifaddr *ifa)
 	struct in_device *in_dev = ifa->ifa_dev;
 	struct in_ifaddr *ifa1;
 
-	if (!ifa->ifa_local)
-		return NULL;
-
 	in_dev_for_each_ifa_rtnl(ifa1, in_dev) {
 		if (ifa1->ifa_mask == ifa->ifa_mask &&
 		    inet_ifa_match(ifa1->ifa_address, ifa) &&
 		    ifa1->ifa_local == ifa->ifa_local)
 			return ifa1;
 	}
+
 	return NULL;
 }
 
@@ -982,6 +980,9 @@ static int inet_rtm_newaddr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
+	if (!nla_get_in_addr(tb[IFA_LOCAL]))
+		return 0;
+
 	ifa = inet_rtm_to_ifa(net, nlh, tb, extack);
 	if (IS_ERR(ifa))
 		return PTR_ERR(ifa);
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)