lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86d785cd-41de-484d-ae17-ffdb4aa9393e@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 12:03:05 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
 dsahern@...nel.org, pablo@...filter.org, kadlec@...filter.org,
 roopa@...dia.com, razor@...ckwall.org, gnault@...hat.com,
 bigeasy@...utronix.de, idosch@...dia.com, ast@...nel.org,
 dongml2@...natelecom.cn, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
 coreteam@...filter.org, bridge@...ts.linux.dev, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 01/10] net: ip: refactor
 fib_validate_source/__fib_validate_source

On 10/15/24 16:07, Menglong Dong wrote:
> @@ -352,6 +353,28 @@ static int __fib_validate_source(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 src, __be32 dst,
>  	struct flowi4 fl4;
>  	bool dev_match;
>  
> +	/* Ignore rp_filter for packets protected by IPsec. */
> +	if (!rpf && !fib_num_tclassid_users(net) &&
> +	    (dev->ifindex != oif || !IN_DEV_TX_REDIRECTS(idev))) {
> +		if (IN_DEV_ACCEPT_LOCAL(idev))
> +			goto last_resort;

IMHO the re-usage of the 'last_resort' macro makes the patch a little
hard to read, as this is an 'accept' condition. I think it would be
better to retain the original code. If you really want to avoid the
small duplication, you could instead introduce an 'ok' label towards the
end of this function:

last_resort:
        if (rpf)
                goto e_rpf;

ok:
        *itag = 0;
        return 0;

And jump there.

Thanks,

Paolo


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ